Closed (fixed)
Project:
USWDS Layout Builder Configuration
Version:
3.1.x-dev
Component:
Code
Priority:
Major
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
15 Jul 2025 at 18:15 UTC
Updated:
27 Nov 2025 at 15:14 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #2
harry slaughterThis patch doesn't work when I apply this version.
Comment #3
harry slaughterI've updated the patch and now it should work. How do I add a patch here?
Comment #4
harry slaughterComment #5
smustgrave commentedPatches should be in MRs for his project probably needs gitlab file too
Comment #6
harry slaughterComment #7
harry slaughterComment #8
kul.pratap commentedCreating MR for this patch.
Comment #10
kul.pratap commentedComment #11
smustgrave commentedHas pipeline issues
Comment #12
kul.pratap commentedI have fixed the pipeline issues.
Please review.
Comment #13
harry slaughterSorry, I'm not familiar with the newish gitlab process.
Comment #19
smustgrave commented@soothmidas there was already a green MR to address this so work should of continued there if related to D11. Started a new 3.1.x branch and will get a D11 release out shortly
Comment #21
smustgrave commentedDid a release but will admit I don't have much time for this module as I haven't used it in years on a project. It really does need a lot of work still. CSS auditing, plugin reviews, etc. But D11 version is there.
Comment #22
soothmidas commented@smustgrave wow, thanks for the very quick response.
This is my first time contributing back to a module via the new GitLab process so I am still learning a lot. I saw that things were failing for the linters so I was looking into correcting those but I guess this isn't the branch to do that if you have a 3.1.x version for 11. I addressed a lot of items in this branch, so I hope it can help you / totally understand not wanting to support a module you don't use on a regular basis. It has a lot of cool features for Layout Builder in general IMO.
How would you recommend I proceed as I am currently using this for a few projects I manage. I feel that the branch I submitted a MR for has worked out most of the bugs from a frontend standpoint. I had a few things to improve the code that I had not included. But I would think/hope that it might address some of the items you feel need to be updated.
Comment #23
smustgrave commentedWould need to open separate issues for certain bugs.
Feature requests will be reviewed on a case by case basis if to be included.