Problem/Motivation
Quoting #2948828-145: Layout Builder's Field Blocks do not work with Quick Edit:
Ok this patch goes patch removing
testLayoutBuilderRenderPipelineForQuickEdit()because seems impossible and beyond the scope of the issue to make random test failure proof QuickEdit test for Layout builder. In HEAD the\Drupal\Tests\quickedit\FunctionalJavascript\QuickEditIntegrationTestwhich is QuickEdit's own tests fail randomly already. So that will need to be fixed in #3037436: [random test failure] Make QuickEditIntegrationTest more robust and fail proof[…]
I talked with @xjm, @tim.plunkett and @Wim Leers and we agreed that this best we can for test coverage given the existing random failures in QuickEdit tests.
Proposed resolution
#2948828: Layout Builder's Field Blocks do not work with Quick Edit should land shortly, and then after #3037436: [random test failure] Make QuickEditIntegrationTest more robust and fail proof is fixed we'll be able to bring back \Drupal\Tests\quickedit\FunctionalJavascript\QuickEditIntegrationTest::testLayoutBuilderRenderPipelineForQuickEdit.
Remaining tasks
- Wait for #2948828: Layout Builder's Field Blocks do not work with Quick Edit ->
[PP-1]then - Wait for #3037436: [random test failure] Make QuickEditIntegrationTest more robust and fail proof -> not postponed on anything anymore then
- Re-review the test coverage on this issue, perhaps adjusting based on changed in #3037436: [random test failure] Make QuickEditIntegrationTest more robust and fail proof
- Commit.
User interface changes
None.
API changes
None.
Data model changes
None.
Release notes snippet
None.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #2 | 3042870-2.patch | 3.44 KB | wim leers |
Comments
Comment #2
wim leersThis is on top of #2948828-145: Layout Builder's Field Blocks do not work with Quick Edit.
Comment #3
wim leersComment #4
tim.plunkettComment #6
catchTentatively re-opening after #3082602: Remove transform rule from css_disable_transitions_test.
Comment #11
dwwIs this issue relevant anymore now that we're moving quickedit back to contrib? Closed (outdated)? Won't fix? Move projects so the issue can be forgotten and die there? ;) Please advise the new quickedit (non)maintainer.
Thanks!
-Derek
Comment #15
danielvezaI'm going through and triaging LB issues. It would be good to get an update/some thoughts on this one. I'm leaning towards marking it as outdated based on #11