README.md does not follow best practice

Patch added. My initial review about the module:

1. Need to mention to enable custom fields created by the module from admin/structure/types
2. Custom fields are being added in all the content type. Need have a another setting for selection of content types.

#2 I have review the patch, apply successfully and working fine for me.

@lomasr, Thanks for the patch, but it is not as per the standards mentioned in Readme template Can you please do the needful with the use of https://www.drupal.org/docs/develop/documenting-your-project/readme-temp....

Hi @lomasr,

• Custom fields are being added in all the content type. Need have a another setting for selection of content types.

  Module is implemented in such a way that if you don't need to enable module for some content types then don't enable custom field in that content types in manage form. Date field is mandatory to have value from alpha2 release because new update allow you to send email to author of node. So, i don't think we need different setting for enabling module for specific content types.

  Alternative :- you can delete the fields for content type you don't need this functionality.

Hi, I am adding a new patch with required changes. Please review it.

Re-rolling patch with more information.

@priya.chat Patch is applied successfully.
Issue: But the first two lines are appearing empty in File.The Introduction should start from first line.

Expected: According to Drupal Standards the first two lines should not be empty.

@vandna b : Patch error appeared

Good day - I was evaluating this module yesterday and too found that the readme lacked some useful configs and links. I saw you posted this issue and am uploading the patch a created yesterday.
The patch includes a README that aligns to d.o documentation standards.

Patch #11 is working fine, Modified patch.

Good catch. I must have missed that section during copy and paste.
Marking RTBC.