This issue is one of several proposed strategies for the Community Working Group to address various questions, concerns, and suggestions raised in recent Drupal community discussions. The full list can be found at https://drupal.org/node/2893907

This is a proposal to expand the number of CWG members. As noted in the webinar, "it has added two members in recent weeks"

Comments

gdemet created an issue. See original summary.

gdemet’s picture

As noted in the issue description, the CWG added two members to the group at the beginning of May, bringing the total to 6: https://www.drupal.org/node/2877006

The CWG also periodically reaches out to subject matter experts to get advice on issues where it needs additional assistance (e.g., mental health issues). Currently, this is done on an ad hoc basis, though we have been discussed how to formalize some of these relationships.

gdemet’s picture

Issue summary: View changes
gdemet’s picture

Issue summary: View changes
ultimike’s picture

Hopefully this will also be part of our [community's evolving governance conversations](https://www.drupal.org/blog/community-discussions-findings-and-webinar).

-mike

gdemet’s picture

I think the big question here is whether our charter should mandate how many "regular" members the group has, or whether it should remain open-ended as it is now.

gdemet’s picture

We've also recently published our policy on subject matter experts: https://www.drupal.org/node/2902355

gdemet’s picture

Status: Active » Needs review

Changing to "Needs review" to see if there's any additional feedback on this.

gdemet’s picture

Status: Needs review » Fixed

Marking this issue as "Fixed".

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.