| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #11 | interdiff.txt | 3.18 KB | kmoll |
| #11 | 2839812-10.patch | 16.68 KB | kmoll |
| #2 | 2839812-2.patch | 15.38 KB | naveenvalecha |
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #11 | interdiff.txt | 3.18 KB | kmoll |
| #11 | 2839812-10.patch | 16.68 KB | kmoll |
| #2 | 2839812-2.patch | 15.38 KB | naveenvalecha |
Comments
Comment #2
naveenvalechaHere's the attached patch with cleanup. Please do test all the functionality of changes after applying the patch.
I have not tested the functionality after doing the changes.
Comment #3
manjit.singhThanks @naveenvalecha for creating this issue, We will test your patch locally.
Comment #4
panshulk commentedHi @naveenvalecha thanks a lot for spending time on this.
After applying the patch I got the following message :
Seems like the patch was not created properly or am I missing out on something?
It would be great if you can provide another patch for this.
Thank You :)
Comment #5
naveenvalecha@panshulk,
Is your local codebase up to date ?
Could you post O/P of
git logComment #6
panshulk commentedHi @naveen
yes the repository is up to date
The o/p if git log is as follows
Comment #7
naveenvalecharepo on my system also points to the same head 203f6bb7b4798f5337ad261664b8f991b326e6ad
Could you give me the commit access. I'll try to commit myself.
Comment #8
panshulk commentedHi @naveenvalecha , I have provided you with the commit access, Now you can make the desired code improvements.
Comment #9
kmoll commentedI will review this patch today. @naveenvalecha, is there a specific reason the composer.json file was removed in the patch?
Comment #10
timmillwoodI took a look at the patch in #2 and think there are a number of things todo.
However these are really scraping the barrel for nit picks and I think this issue should be a blocker for anything.
As we are looking at really picky nit picks, I think we should move to short syntax arrays.
There's no harm in having a composer.json, if anything I'd advise it.
I'm not sure this needs the extra brackets.
This might be easier to read as a single line.
Comment #11
kmoll commentedI have made a few small updates. In removing the `adobeanalytics` namespace from some of the form variables, it was not removed from the function to add the variable inputs, so it was not putting the variables in the table, and not saving the variables in the submit function.
I updated the patch and am committing. There is still an issue with the functionality of the variables form, but that is outlined in the issue #2831122: Add variable section of form does not work and should be updated shortly.
committing the updates. Thanks!
Comment #13
kmoll commentedComment #14
panshulk commentedThanks all for reporting this and picking this up :)
Comment #15
naveenvalecha#10.2
There's not any hard requirement on d.org to add the composer.json in the module. If the module has hard dependency on any external library then add it unless its not needed. It's a small improvement so nothing blocker of either adding/removing it.
Edit: As per latest changes. it's fine to keep it. I have not checked them yet https://www.drupal.org/node/2840512
#10.1
+1
I'll review it tonight and I believe in the meanwhile this issue #2831122: Add variable section of form does not work will also gets fixed.
// Naveen