will this have the support for imagecache ?
And mainly, what is the diiference with imagefield ?

Comments

jpetso’s picture

jpetso commented
Status: Active » Fixed

Shwoop, imagecache support just implemented. I didn't even notice this issue before doing so :D

And mainly, the difference to imagefield is that this module is an extension for filefield whereas imagefield is a clone of filefield (including a lot of duplicated code) with a few image specific extensions. In other words, this module is supposed to replace imagefield in a fraction of imagefield's code size.

Most notably, this approach also makes it possible to mix & match support for different file types, as of today's yet unreleased version that can even be configured with a nice admin interface.

Anonymous’s picture

Anonymous (not verified) commented
Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for two weeks with no activity.