Require README.txt for the module

+++ b/README.md
@@ -1,17 +1,42 @@
-# Remote image
+CONTENTS OF THIS FILE
+---------------------

content or contents ?

1. +++ b/README.md
   @@ -1,17 +1,42 @@
   +When building a site which leverages 3rd party APIs with images, you don't want to store those images
   

   We usually wrap lines at 80 cols.

2. +++ b/README.md
   @@ -1,17 +1,42 @@
   +Therefore this module provides a custom field type, which allows you to store the URL to the image, as
   

   80 cols.

3. +++ b/README.md
   @@ -1,17 +1,42 @@
   +Field module(Field API to add fields to entities like nodes and users.)
   

   s/module(/module (/

4. +++ b/README.md
   @@ -1,17 +1,42 @@
   + * On successfull enable of the module, you will find a new field type "Remote Image" with
   

   "After the module has been successfully enabled, ..."

   "field of type ..."

   Also, 80 cols.

5. +++ b/README.md
   @@ -1,17 +1,42 @@
   +   custom widget and fiedl formatter.
   

   "a custom widget and field formatter."

6. +++ b/README.md
   @@ -1,17 +1,42 @@
   +Current maintainers:
   

   maintainer

updated patch as per the comment #6

1. +++ b/README.md
   @@ -1,17 +1,45 @@
   + * Maintainers
   

   Thinking about this more, since we have only one maintainer, we should probably go with "Maintainer"

2. +++ b/README.md
   @@ -1,17 +1,45 @@
   + * Field module (Field module to add fields to entities like nodes and users.)
   

   I suggest "Field (to add fields to entities like nodes and users.)" so that we don't repeat "module" over and over again.

3. +++ b/README.md
   @@ -1,17 +1,45 @@
   + of type "Remote Image" with custom widget and field formatter.
   

   How about "a custom widget"?

4. +++ b/README.md
   @@ -1,17 +1,45 @@
   +MAINTAINERS
   

   MAINTAINER

5. +++ b/README.md
   @@ -1,17 +1,45 @@
   +Current maintainer:
   

   Per the above, we can drop this line completely.

@anavarre added the patch as per comment #8

Almost!

1. +++ b/README.md
   @@ -1,17 +1,44 @@
   + * Maintainers
   

   Should be "Maintainer", or, if we keep "Maintainers", then the below "MAINTAINER" section needs to be pluralized.

2. +++ b/README.md
   @@ -1,17 +1,44 @@
   +This module requires the following module:
   

   I'd simply reword this as "This module has a dependency on the core Field module, to add fields to entities, like nodes and users."

3. +++ b/README.md
   @@ -1,17 +1,44 @@
   +   of type "Remote Image" with field formatter.
   

   "with a custom widget and field formatter."

Updated patch as per comment #11

+++ b/README.md
@@ -1,17 +1,42 @@
+This module has a dependency on the core Field module, to add fields to entities, like nodes and users.

This line should be wrapped at 80 cols.

Since this can easily fixed on commit, I'm tentatively marking it as RTBC, pending @dawehner's review. Thanks for sticking to it.

+++ b/README.md
@@ -1,17 +1,43 @@
+This module has a dependency on the core Field module, to add fields to entities, ¶

Thanks, but you forgot a comma and invisible space at the end of line.

+++ b/README.md
@@ -1,17 +1,43 @@
+,like nodes and users.

Missing whitespace between "," and "like", but this can be fixed on commit.

-

Fixed @anavarre.

Patch it's in attachment.

Good Work.

Regards.

Thank you @RenatoG!