Needs work
Project:
Feeds empty
Component:
User interface
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Bug report
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
19 Aug 2014 at 08:27 UTC
Updated:
25 Feb 2021 at 21:45 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
infokleene commentedComment #2
milossramek commentedHi, according to the description your module is exactly what I need - no changes of fields not existing in an import feed (csv file in my case). However, does not work for me - the fields are reset. Should I switch this functionality on somewhere?
thanks
Milos
Comment #3
nntechnology commentedHi, any chance of this becoming a published module? No checkboxes appear for me either, i tried with the dev release of Feeds as well but that caused errors. In the end i had to spend a lot of time figuring out how to hard code the fields that i wanted to ignore zeros, not ideal, but it was crucial for my customers site...
Comment #4
vbard commentedHi.
I've got that module to work. Here is a patch and a whole module for those who don't want to go patching. I've done some testing, module seems to work good for all kind of field types I had in my testing project site.
Comment #5
milossramek commentedHi,
I have just tried the full module of #4 - with no success, the fields still get deleted. Are there any settings?
--
milos
Comment #6
milossramek commentedHi,
there must be settings somewhere - if the block
// Will do only if our setting on that mapping is set.
if (empty($mapping['feeds_empty_use_old']) ) {
continue;
}
in feeds_empty.feeds.inc is commented out, the module works as expected.
I would expect such settings in Structure/Feeds Importerd/.../settings/FeedsNodeProcessor, but there is no such thing there (pls see the screenshot node_proc_settings.png)
--
Milos
Comment #7
vbard commentedHi MIlos!
You should expect seeing that settings in "Mapping" section and you can set it for every field separately. See screenshot.
Comment #8
milossramek commentedOh, thank you, I did not expect the settings there - however, since each field can have different setting (which makes sense) this place is natural.
Thanks a lot again, I think this module should get out of the sandbox and become normally available.
Milos
Comment #9
nwom commentedSetting to Needs Review, since a patch is attached. I haven't tested it myself yet.