This patch will allow the developer to decide if they want a pager at the bottom of a view.

Simple checkbox 'Add pager at bottom of view'

by default it is set to NO.

Comments

davidburns’s picture

Status: Active » Needs review
StatusFileSize
new2.38 KB

Here's the patch

PLEASE NOTE: I also removed the "ALL" link as well it was commented out.

dlux’s picture

i'm interested in this feature since there's no css that distinguishes the top alpha pager from the bottom. i really really like the alpha pager, but it's obscuring the numeric pager at the bottom, which i need to stand out as much as possible.

the php going on in this patch is beyond me at this time, so i'd like to express an interest in this resolution, and integration into 5.x-1.2.

keep up the good work folks, i thank u for it..

douggreen’s picture

Status: Needs review » Fixed

I didn't implement this patch, but I implemented several new things that will give the site-builder control over the placement of the pager. I changed the setting in views, so that you can define placement along with the selection of the alpha pager. I added div's around each of the pager's, so that you can style them differently. And lastly, I add a call to a theme function, so that you can control this in the theme.

Anonymous’s picture

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for two weeks with no activity.

johnalbin’s picture

Status: Closed (fixed) » Active

I mentioned this over in http://drupal.org/node/212171, but I didn't get a response.

Since the question is related to this feature…

I'm wondering why the "placement" is stored in its own database table. It seems a waste to add an additional database query to retrieve it, when it would be less database-intensive to use variable_get(). What's the rationale?

douggreen’s picture

Status: Active » Closed (fixed)

Please don't re-open issues, unless they are really broken. I would prefer if you had just added another comment to that issue, which would of brought it back to the top of my issue queue.

i responded over on #212171.