as per discussions in IRC with moshe, OG's CVS branches weren't being used properly for a while. in an effort to help clean up, i created a DRUPAL-5--2 branch based on the DRUPAL-5--2-2 release tag. unfortunately, there have been a number of bugs fixed in HEAD that were really bug fixes for the 5.x-2.* series, in addition to some new features that will become the 5.x-3.* series. i came up with a list of all the commits since DRUPAL-5--2-2, and moshe filtered the list for which ones belong in DRUPAL-5--2:

og.install: no backport.
og.js: both changes.
og_views.inc: no backport.
og.module: 1.346, 1.347, 1.353, 1.355, 1.356, 1.357, 1.358, 1.359, 1.360, 1.361 is a major bugfix so maybe leave it out. if you take, you have to take an update function (getting complicated), 1.362

i'll try to get this cleaned up quickly (depending on how tricky og.module gets).

CommentFileSizeAuthor
#2 og_D5--2_sync.patch_1.txt11.32 KBdww
#1 og_D5--2_sync.patch.txt9.1 KBdww

Comments

dww’s picture

dww
we/he/they
commented
Status: Active » Needs review
StatusFileSize
new og_D5--2_sync.patch.txt9.1 KB

here's a patch for everything except og.module revision 1.361. i'll take a look at that revision now and see how bad that would be to backport, too.

dww’s picture

dww
we/he/they
commented
StatusFileSize
new og_D5--2_sync.patch_1.txt11.32 KB

ok, 1.361 wasn't so bad, and the db update isn't that tricky. OG sorely needs to adopt the new numbering scheme proposal for db updates: http://drupal.org/node/136078

moshe weitzman’s picture

moshe weitzman commented
Status: Needs review » Reviewed & tested by the community

looks ok to me. dww is now maintainer of this branch :)

dww’s picture

dww
we/he/they
commented
Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Fixed

committed to DRUPAL-5--2.

Anonymous’s picture

(not verified) commented
Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)