In the Field API documentation at #object is not documented.
It is, however, causing errors for me, so it would be good to document what #object refers to, and whether it is mandatory or optional (i.e. if it can be removed without any adverse side-effects.)

#6 doc-field-API-render-info-1310164-6.patch548 bytessven.lauer
PASSED: [[SimpleTest]]: [MySQL] 33,406 pass(es). View


jhodgdon’s picture

Version:7.8» 8.x-dev
Status:Active» Postponed (maintainer needs more info)

Um. What is #object, and where/how is it causing you problems?

Mark_L6n’s picture

Version:8.x-dev» 7.8

I don't know what it is, it's not documented! But the Field render arrays I have examined with dpm() have it, with a value of 'stdClass'. I have tried printing them out to see what is inside but have failed so far. I was wondering if they were pointers to an enclosing object for context purposes, but that's only a wild guess.
As for the error, I am copying fields from a node to a QuickTabs tab inside that node and receiving an 'Uncaught exception thrown in session handler.' error message. Unsetting '#object' takes care of the message, but I don't know if doing this could have any bad side-effects. I'm asking about this at

As an aside, I hope I am posting to the right place for documentation requests--I read to not post in the comments section but in the documentation issue queue. Please advise if I should post elsewhere. (Edit: I changed version # to 7.8, thinking I had made an error, but then saw you had changed it to 8. Apologies.)

jhodgdon’s picture

Oh, the field *render* arrays. That is not what is documented on the Field API page, and I don't know off-hand what they contain, or where they are documented (if anywhere actually).

And yes, this is the right place to post for documentation on

sven.lauer’s picture

Status:Postponed (maintainer needs more info)» Needs review

This actually IS documented at field_attach_view(), where a "sample structure" is given, containing:

  '#object' => the fieldable entity being displayed,

Works as designed? Or should we link to this information from somewhere? It is not obvious for someone theming an entity etc. that this would be documented at field_attach_view() ...

jhodgdon’s picture

Status:Needs review» Active

Thanks for the detective work!

It makes sense to me that after the description of the $field and $instance arrays, we could add a line saying something like "See field_attach_view() for documentation of the render array for formatting a field." (or maybe you can come up with better wording)

sven.lauer’s picture

Status:Active» Needs review
new548 bytes
PASSED: [[SimpleTest]]: [MySQL] 33,406 pass(es). View

Rolling a patch based on jhodgdon's suggestion in #5 (different wording, though).

jhodgdon’s picture

Version:7.8» 8.x-dev
Status:Needs review» Reviewed & tested by the community
Issue tags:+needs backport to D7

Love it. Thanks!

Oh, this should be 8.x. Just in case, I'll push the "retest".

jhodgdon’s picture

webchick’s picture

Status:Reviewed & tested by the community» Fixed

Committed and pushed to 8.x and 7.x. Thanks!

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.