Closed (fixed)
Project:
Drupal core
Version:
7.x-dev
Component:
documentation
Priority:
Minor
Category:
Bug report
Assigned:
Unassigned
Issue tags:
Reporter:
Created:
21 Dec 2010 at 05:05 UTC
Updated:
3 Jan 2014 at 02:41 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
mlncn commentedahem. The aforementioned "attached patch".
Comment #2
jhodgdonI think this text is awkward and I wish we could come up with a better way of saying it without people complaining we are telling people about basic PHP 5 syntax.
There is also a space at the end of one of the lines in your patch, which needs to be removed.
It would also be better to have this in the documentation component, or at least tagged with "needs documentation", because it is a purely doc patch. What is the "dgd7" tag anyway?
Comment #3
mlncn commentedRemoved not just the space but the extra line of text causing it... Now communicated what actually matters, where the revision ID is available, directly.
I actually like it now, and again, it has the benefit of not being wrong.
("dgd7" is issues that i've come across in the course of work related to Definitive Guide to Drupal 7- if miscellaneous tags are confusing i apologize; i think webchick decided not to use a usingdrupal tag for issues she found revising Using Drupal but i wish she had; i'd love to know / see the list. Speaking of the book, though, jhodgdon... i've been bugging arienk but i've been meaning to ask you: what do you want tens of thousands of book-buyers (and/or torrent downloaders) to know about documentation, as developers or just anyone seeking to contribute to Drupal? hit me in IRC or e-mail!)
Comment #4
mlncn commentedComment #5
jhodgdonI like the docblock line just fine.
I'm not too thrilled about:
I don't think we have a concept of the "node owner". How about saying "original node author" instead?
Comment #6
mlncn commentedGood point! Node author is what is used in core documentation, and node owner does not appear at all. And node author is much less capitalistic! Corrected. On second thought rerolled again and did not include "original" because the node author can change, the distinction that matters is between revision and node proper.
Comment #7
mlncn commentedComment #8
jhodgdonThis looks fine to me. Thanks!
Comment #10
mlncn commented(This documentation patch is still RTBC, whatever the testing bot thinks about the MySQL environment.)
Comment #11
jhodgdonI filed this issue regarding the randomly failing test (you are right there is no way this patch cused that failure):
#1010136: Prevent drupalGet / checkForMetaRefresh from recursing too deep
Comment #12
webchickCommitted to HEAD. Thanks!