Problem/Motivation
The Project Browser Initiative wants nice project logos for better UX. The logo will be displayed on the card for your module in the Project Browser (as well as on drupalcode.org as your project avatar, and on drupal.org on your project page).
The Rebuild Cache Access module needs a logo for this objective.
Proposed resolution
- Create a logo that is 512x512 square dimension in PNG format without animations.
- The file size should be 10k or less.
- Use a lossy image tool (such as pngquant) to reduce the file size while keeping the image quality at around 80%.
Examples:
https://www.drupal.org/files/issues/2024-07-04/jQuery-UI-Selectable-fs8.png
https://www.drupal.org/files/issues/2023-05-03/Embed-Project-Logo.png
https://www.drupal.org/files/issues/2022-04-28/pathauto-fs8.png
https://www.drupal.org/files/issues/2022-09-23/search_api.png
https://www.drupal.org/files/issues/2022-09-23/Rest%20UI.png
https://www.drupal.org/files/issues/2023-08-16/entity_queue_3.png
https://www.drupal.org/files/issues/2022-10-04/views_slideshow_logo_1.png
https://www.drupal.org/files/issues/2022-09-30/redis-project-browser-cub...
https://www.drupal.org/files/issues/2022-09-23/DropzoneJS_v2-min.png
https://www.drupal.org/files/issues/2023-08-14/File_Metadata_Manager_2.png
MAINTAINERS: Once a logo is reviewed and approved, it should be added to the root folder of your project's repo, and be named
logo.png. This must be present on your project’sdefault branch. If you have a logo as the first image in theImagesfield on your project page, please remove it. The logo will be displayed on the cards in the Project Browser grid and list views.
Review steps
- Review any logos on this ticket.
- Provide design feedback if applicable.
- If multiple logos are provided, choose your preferred one.
- Ensure logo meet the requirements:
- 512px by 512px square
- PNG format
- no animations
- 10k file size or less
- reasonable image quality
- visually represents the project
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #7 | IMG_9907.png | 4.39 KB | norman.lol |
| #6 | Rebuild-Cache-Access.png | 6.81 KB | sourojeetpaul |
Issue fork rebuild_cache_access-3459403
Show commands
Start within a Git clone of the project using the version control instructions.
Or, if you do not have SSH keys set up on git.drupalcode.org:
Comments
Comment #2
kristen polMoving to project's queue per @leslieg.
Comment #3
kristen polThe current screenshot doesn't match the requirements.
Comment #4
norman.lolComment #5
sourojeetpaul commentedI'm picking this up from here!
Comment #6
sourojeetpaul commented@leymannx @Kristen Pol
This is the logo, I've managed to create in this while. Pls have a look...
Comment #7
norman.lolHey hey, there is already a logo I just need to find the time to export it and add it. That's why I assigned the issue to me already.
Comment #8
norman.lolComment #9
norman.lolComment #10
sourojeetpaul commentedOh sorry @leymannx, I was not aware of that, also haven't seen any such comment on the thread from your end on this!
Sorry for the confusion.
Just curious what's pending now as the status is still in NW. Else I could've helped in the review process.
Do let me know if I can be of any help here!
Comment #11
kristen polNice logo 👍 should we create an MR?
Comment #12
norman.lol@kristen pol – If somebody is open for it and the purple logo is already matching the file specs, an MR is much appreciated. (I'm still on vacation, currently AFK.)
@sourojeetpaul – Sorry for not including important info and lots of thanks still for your submission. 🩵💙
Comment #13
sourojeetpaul commentedHi @leymannx,
The logo you provided looks good to me. If you're ready to ship it in, I can help with the MR!
I'm moving it to RTBC then as of now :)
Comment #14
norman.lolThanks. We need the MR. 🚀
Comment #16
kristen polMR is ready.
Comment #17
sourojeetpaul commentedHi @leymannx,
I think we're thinking divergently here. As far as my observation...for logo issues we're moving the state of the ticket based on the logo itself and not the MR, as the logo is the primary one here! Hence I moved the issue to RTBC on reviewing the logo.
Keeping the state of NW might have created confusion to others, as they could be under an impression that something needs to be fixed on the logo itself!
Anyways, The MR looks good to me, hence RTBC++ for the logo and MR also.
Comment #19
norman.lolAn MR is work and context of the current work needed comes from the issue comments.
Thank you all, logo is in. 😊
Comment #20
norman.lolComment #21
kristen polThanks 🙏
Comment #22
sourojeetpaul commentedThanks :)