quick edit page runs in endless loop if module is enabled.
TypeError: carriers[$(...).val(...)] is undefined
var defaultUrl = carriers[$('#edit-carrier-url').val()].url;
window for quick edit will not open
Perfect Module
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #28 | 2269901-simple-package-tracking.patch | 1.79 KB | fugazi |
| #7 | simple_package_tracking-2269901.patch | 895 bytes | fugazi |
| 18-05-_2014_18-47-56.jpg | 47.59 KB | fugazi |
Comments
Comment #1
fugazi commentedComment #2
pyrello commentedfugazi - Hey, I am not currently working with Drupal anymore, so I am not in a good position to fix this bug for you. If you would like to submit a patch, I can commit it for you.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Sean
Comment #3
fugazi commentedHello Sean,
That would be very nice if they would do that. It is a great module and I would like to inserting. What should I do for you that you can help. I am pleased with your response.
Best Regards
Patrick
Comment #4
pyrello commentedPatrick - if you know any other developers that are currently working with Drupal and who would be willing to debug and contribute a patch, that would probably be the best. Short of someone sponsoring continued development of the module, I really just don't have the time to do anything more involved than committing patches.
Comment #5
fugazi commentedmany thanks for the answer. That's a pity they did not find the time. I would also buy a beer. I'll be watching perhaps there is someone who wants to continue to cultivate here. I buy beers.
Thank you and best regards
Comment #6
fugazi commenteduntil now, the error could be corrected:
from time to time I still get an error: An AJAX HTTP error occurred.
Comment #7
fugazi commentedfirst patch I hope it works
Comment #8
pyrello commentedSetting to Needs review so it can be vetted. If you know anyone else who can try out this patch, I'd appreciate it.
Comment #10
pyrello commentedPatrick, it looks like there was an issue with the patch. Can you review and re-submit?
Comment #11
fugazi commentedComment #12
fugazi commentedI'm not a profi but I seem to be only the name of the patch was wrong
Comment #13
pyrello commentedWhen you submit a patch, go ahead and set the status of the issue to "Needs review". This triggers the testing bot to queue up the patch to be tested.
Comment #15
fugazi commentedok I have to read again why the name of the patch is wrong. Since this is my first, it's totally new to me. Did not that makes it so much work :)
Comment #16
pyrello commentedPatrick, I don't know if you noticed, but on the patches that failed testing, there is a link to view the testing results. That should provide you with any information you need to fix the issue with the patch.
Comment #17
fugazi commentedI've already seen it, but he writes that the filename is wrong, and would not meet the standard. well, also do not know any further. but I look at it tomorrow again to
Comment #18
fugazi commentedComment #19
fugazi commentedComment #21
fugazi commentedComment #22
fugazi commentedComment #24
fugazi commentedComment #25
fugazi commentedComment #27
fugazi commentedComment #28
fugazi commentedComment #29
fugazi commentedComment #30
fugazi commentedComment #32
pyrello commentedCommit patch. See above comment.