Support for Drupal 7 is ending on 5 January 2025—it’s time to migrate to Drupal 10! Learn about the many benefits of Drupal 10 and find migration tools in our resource center.
This is a one-line patch to improve table accessibility by adding 'scope="col"' to the table header tags.
It would be great if it was possible to add optional table summaries and captions to tables.
Comment | File | Size | Author |
---|---|---|---|
#3 | views_add_scope_col.patch | 2.03 KB | mgifford |
views_accessible.patch | 399 bytes | henrrrik | |
Comments
Comment #1
brianbrarian CreditAttribution: brianbrarian commentedI applied this patch to views.module, but it doesn't seem to have added scope="col" to the days-of-the-week table headers in the monthly calendar and mini block calendar. Is there something else I need to do to make that work?
[Update 24 June 2008. Got this done through theming.]
Comment #2
mgiffordAdding accessibility tag & link to Group - http://groups.drupal.org/accessibility
Comment #3
mgiffordThis is still an issue in the recent D7 version of Views.
Comment #4
dawehnerSorry but the old patch had a total different scope ;)
Here is the new issue http://drupal.org/node/864006
Comment #5
dawehnerWith scope i mean totally different position of the table
Comment #6
mgiffordthanks for setting up the new issue. I'm not sure any suggestions like this are going to get into D5 mind you.
Comment #7
dawehneri don't think that any of the d5 patches will be applied.
Comment #8
merlinofchaos CreditAttribution: merlinofchaos commentedI think the point is:
Please create new issues for D7 rather than moving D5 issues to D7. In the new issue you can provide a link to the old issue to retain history.
Comment #9
mgiffordIn core it's not uncommon to just change the version of the issue so I assumed this would be fine. The goal however is to add more definition to provide greater context for screen readers. There's a good podcast on it here:
http://webaxe.blogspot.com/2007/08/podcast-54-summary-attribute.html
Comment #10
merlinofchaos CreditAttribution: merlinofchaos commentedUnderstood. We find that changing issues midstream makes them difficult to follow the actual purpose, so I prefer new issues as it reduces the workload of the maintainers.
Comment #11
mgiffordMakes sense & good to know. I'm just marking this as won't fix. It can be dealt with in D6 or D7.
I've got some questions #864006: Improve table semantics by adding scope or headers/id attributes but can deal with them there