Support for Drupal 7 is ending on 5 January 2025—it’s time to migrate to Drupal 10! Learn about the many benefits of Drupal 10 and find migration tools in our resource center.
Enabling Node displays make the settings and node displays supported by cck_fieldgroup_tabs dissapear
I am not sure which module's responsibility is to integrate with the other
Comment | File | Size | Author |
---|---|---|---|
#6 | 582618_nd_fieldgroup.patch | 748 bytes | hefox |
Comments
Comment #1
GiorgosKhere is the link to the project
http://drupal.org/project/cck_fieldgroup_tabs
Comment #2
swentel CreditAttribution: swentel commentedThis belongs in the contrib section from now on.
Comment #3
agrivas CreditAttribution: agrivas commentedI think the issue is even deeper. I can see how this is compatible with fieldgroups in general. I am used to creating fieldgroups by dragging a field under a group at the "Manage Fields" tab. Since drag n' drop functionality is disabled with node displays I can't see how can I assign a field to a group.
Comment #4
butler360 CreditAttribution: butler360 commentedSame issue here. With a content type that already had a group and fields under it, it shows up that way on "Manage Fields" page. If I add a new field, though, I can't see any way to add it to a group.
Comment #5
hefox CreditAttribution: hefox commentedWhy is it changing my manage fields display? Manage fields, in my mind, is for the form and a display module should likely not be doing too much too them, unless it's adding more functionality; but atm, as far as I can tell, its getting rid of functionality without any settings to prevent that (for now I commented out the register alter). I need my field groups for my vertical tabs! :(.
display not working when having fieldgroups anyway
in ds_build_fields_and_regions
However since its invoked in alter, fieldgroups has already reordered $node->content so the field is under 'group_whatever' 'groups' now.
However, there's no checking of that, so it adds an entry
which conflicts in content_field $op == 'preprocess_node'
the isset node content field returns TRUE (though it only contains a weight), so the correct information (ie what's under group name group field) isn't used, so the rendered value is not set correctly.
Just doing a check
works other than weight for display is ignored.
Comment #6
hefox CreditAttribution: hefox commentedHere's a 'temporary' patch till one that works apprioently with fieldgroups. It removes fieldgroups from the node before display.
Comment #7
swentel CreditAttribution: swentel commentedOk, christmas holidays, time to work on the modules again, sorry a bit for the delays. As a first step, I commited the part where we altered the theme registry for the fields overview form. This works again, I'll review the fieldgroups issue and patch later on!
Comment #8
mautumn CreditAttribution: mautumn commentedHaving similar problem with fieldgroups. They disappeared off a form when I installed NDs, and re-appeared when I removed it... Fieldgroups is too important a feature for me to be without it so I'll have to wait until this "bug" (?) is fixed before I can use NDs.
Looks like a great module though. I hope you can sort this out. Keep up the great work.
Comment #9
Flying Drupalist CreditAttribution: Flying Drupalist commentedSubscribe
Comment #10
ManyNancy CreditAttribution: ManyNancy commentedPlease support multi-groups as well!
Comment #11
svendecabooterAny progress on this? This is blocking me from using this module as well.
If there's anything I can do to help speed up the process, let me know.
Comment #12
pauljb CreditAttribution: pauljb commentedsubscribe
Comment #13
ManyNancy CreditAttribution: ManyNancy commentedI tried to print one manually in a code field but was not having much luck.
http://drupal.org/node/680104
Can anyone help with this? It should at least be a decent temporary solution.
Comment #14
ManyNancy CreditAttribution: ManyNancy commentedI can't figure out how to do this. Can we have some information on when this might be fixed or any tips on how to implement the fields manually.
Thanks.
Comment #15
Trunkhorn CreditAttribution: Trunkhorn commentedInterested in this as well.
Comment #16
ManyNancy CreditAttribution: ManyNancy commentedHi, I saw this under D7 in the roadmap. Is this feature not coming before D7?
Comment #17
swentel CreditAttribution: swentel commentedNo, this is intented for the 6.x-1.1 release, we're working heavily on it.
Comment #18
Flying Drupalist CreditAttribution: Flying Drupalist commentedSo this is definitely coming out after 7.x?
Can I offer $50 to contribute to an earlier release?
Comment #19
christianpound CreditAttribution: christianpound commentedsubscribe
Comment #20
seutje CreditAttribution: seutje commenteddamn, this looked easy to fix at first, but deep is the rabbit hole :(
Comment #21
Andrew Gorokhovets CreditAttribution: Andrew Gorokhovets commentedAny progress on this?
Comment #22
swentel CreditAttribution: swentel commentedSorry for the delay - we're a bit stuck too on this feature since it's not *that* easy to implement. We're also constantly shifting on 2 thoughts, namely
Anyone is welcome to add patches of course!
@Flying Drupalist As soon this is in (and 3 other, rather easier issues), there is a new release, D7 has no priority for now. My goal for a new release is to get this out by the end of March.
Comment #23
Flying Drupalist CreditAttribution: Flying Drupalist commentedThank you, makes me happy to hear that.
1. I think everyone's looking forward to this.
2. Highly intriguing, I can see this being useful to combine CCK fields + blocks into tabsets. But unless I'm misunderstanding this is not something that can replace CCK fieldgroups, and especially not multigroups. It would be a fun additional. Everyone really really needs #1, so unless there's some way to use the ds fieldgroups to substitute for regular fieldgroups, please implement #1 posthaste.
Our thanks.
Comment #24
aimevpsubscribe
Comment #25
ManyNancy CreditAttribution: ManyNancy commented#1 please!
Comment #26
swentel CreditAttribution: swentel commentedQuick update - the dev version of ds and nd_contrib (with nd_cck in it) have working code. It's in fact our own version of fieldgroups (which means that you now can create fieldgroups with DS too, you'll see a new tab called fieldgroups at admin/ds/nd) but the fieldgroups of cck are recognized too! The main problem right now is in the display field overview form with the javascript which isn't listening very well right now - we're solving that issue this week, but we're very very close :)
Note: don't use in production of course!
Comment #27
ManyNancy CreditAttribution: ManyNancy commentedVery cool, thanks!
Comment #28
ManyNancy CreditAttribution: ManyNancy commentedI tried to test it. Latest dev (march 5 contrib / march 9 of ds) of the contrib + ds.
Is this working for multigroups? I see the group, I tried to put it into a region.
The group becomes indented in the admin, probably the js issue you mentioned?
But the group doesn't show up on the node.
Thanks.
Comment #29
okeedoak CreditAttribution: okeedoak commentedsubscribing
Comment #30
ManyNancy CreditAttribution: ManyNancy commentedAre there any updates here?
Thanks.
Comment #31
swentel CreditAttribution: swentel commentedYou can test, works perfectly now! Make sure, you have all latest dev release of the entire Display Suite module. Release 1.1 is coming.
Did a split of though for multigroups, which goes into 1.2, see #753842: Support CCK multigroups
Comment #32
swentel CreditAttribution: swentel commentedMarking this one as fixed - release 1.1 pretty soon.
Comment #33
picardo CreditAttribution: picardo commentedsubscribing
Comment #34
picardo CreditAttribution: picardo commented@swentel
I still see this issue on custom content types. I downloaded the dev releases of the entire display suite. The fieldgroups are still missing unfortunately. :-(
Comment #35
swentel CreditAttribution: swentel commentedCan't reproduce though on my local dev machine. I created a content type 'test' and added a fieldgroup which showed up nicely. I think there's something else more fundamental going wrong on your setup (cf your other issue which also has troubles with content types).
Comment #36
chansion.vc CreditAttribution: chansion.vc commentedsubscribing
Comment #37
swentel CreditAttribution: swentel commentedMarking as closed - fieldgroups is working fine (in dev). Open new issues for other requests regarding fieldgroups.