Quoting an email to the DD&I group:

Hi!

I can detail more of the background behind this next week but I wanted to get something out to you before the weekend to give you the maximum amount of time here…

The Drupal Association are looking to step up even further than before the work we do to support people who identify with under-represented groups in our community, and open source in general, come to think of it.

Part of that work means picking areas to “double down” on and really try to make a difference. Based upon data from previous DrupalCons and looking at the community data as a whole, that absolutely should be Race and Gender.

So, during DrupalCon registration, whilst we still intend to ask the “Big 8” question from previous years, in an effort to ensure we continue that year-on-year trend data, we want to get much more detailed data on the two areas of interest. So, two follow-up questions will be alongside it.

And this is where I would like to invite DD&I for their input on the actual questions to be asked, along with a number of similar groups from outside the Drupal community.

I have copied the questions as far as we have got them so far. I’d like to know if the DD&I would be interested in collaborating on refining them over the next week or so. Sorry but we need them actually in the registration system on 9 October.

I do appreciate that I’m asking DD&I to do free work and even then asking the group to do free work by an “aggressive” deadline. You are absolutely fine to politely decline but I didn’t want to not give you a chance to participate - it felt the right thing to do.

Either way, let me know on Monday how the DD&I feel about it and we can work out detail from there.



Thanks


Rachel

This issue is to record the contributions of those that participated in sending back feedback after the discussion at https://drupal.slack.com/archives/C1BCR7XL6/p1602005143107600

Comments

rachel_norfolk created an issue. See original summary.

rachel_norfolk’s picture

Issue summary: View changes
sparklingrobots’s picture

Race/Ethnicity Question:
There isn't a category for indigenous people of Australia/New Zealand
Folks recommended against combining African-American, African & Caribbean. "This identifies us as descendants of the stolen people from the Transatlantic slave trade which is separate from other persons from African countries, which don't seem to be listed."
Typo: Should be spelled Laotian
Folks recommended against lumping Black & Brown together in one category (reads as "not white")
Gender/Gender Identity Question:

This one caused a lot of debate, but I'll try to summarize.
Should the question be split into 2 or even 3 parts? (Example here.) It felt weird to several of us to have non-equivalent choices in the same list. The multiselect felt like it provided a workable option, but it still felt a bit awkward. e.g. cisgender and male are not the same type of concept.
If kept as one question, perhaps it could be something like "Which aspects of gender or gender identity" to make it clear that they aren't all just variants of the same thing.

General feedback:
In the introductory text, folks stumbled over "programmers" and felt it could be simplified to just "contributors" -- unless the data set is programmers only.
Two thumbs up on the statements welcoming feedback. We wondered if that could appear above the list because it's great & important.
Why not use the Open Demographics question formats for race and gender? Those are being adopted more widely (including by CHAOSS) and it could relieve some of the burden of having to keep up a feedback loop -- you could direct folks to make PRs to Open Demographics instead.
Can there be explainers for all the categories? e.g. what age qualifies as underrepresented? What's the difference between Learning Differences and Ability?

rachel_norfolk’s picture

rachel_norfolk’s picture