Problem/Motivation

The filtering works fine but when links are hidden the li tags have padding and/or border that stays behind thus taking up space.

Steps to reproduce

Proposed resolution

Hide the parent li

Before

After

Remaining tasks

N/A

User interface changes

No empty li tags

API changes

N/A

Data model changes

N/A

Release notes snippet

N/A

CommentFileSizeAuthor
#115 interdiff-113_115.txt1.67 KBGauravvvv
#115 3223048-115.patch5.91 KBGauravvvv
#113 3223048-113.patch4.24 KBRishabh Vishwakarma
#112 3223048-112.patch4.25 KBRishabh Vishwakarma
#110 3223048-110.patch4.26 KBRishabh Vishwakarma
#104 3223048-104.patch4.27 KBsmustgrave
#104 interdiff-91-104.txt712 bytessmustgrave
#101 3223048-101.patch3.22 KBVigneshn
#100 3223048-updating-the-core-files-to-make-it-compatible-with-9_5_x.patch5.33 KBVigneshn
#98 3223048-nr-bot.txt85 bytesneeds-review-queue-bot
#97 3223048-97.patch6.35 KBdmytro-aragorn
#93 aftr_patch91.mov4.54 MBsonam.chaturvedi
#93 before_patch91.mov2.71 MBsonam.chaturvedi
#91 3223048-91.patch4.26 KBsmustgrave
#91 interdiff-84-91.txt1.15 KBsmustgrave
#85 interdiff_84-85.txt1.43 KBRishi Kulshreshtha
#85 3223048-85.patch4.45 KBRishi Kulshreshtha
#84 3223048-84.patch4.3 KBsmustgrave
#84 interdiff-78-84.txt1.17 KBsmustgrave
#80 withoutPatch-d10.1.x.png117.54 KBAsha Nair
#78 3223048-78-D10.patch4.28 KBsmustgrave
#78 interdiff-72-78.txt1.19 KBsmustgrave
#74 3223048-74.patch4.05 KBRatan Priya
#72 3223048-72.patch3.95 KBsmustgrave
#70 layout_builder_search_spacing_issue.patch1.45 KBShifali Baghel
#69 3223048-69.patch5.77 KBsmustgrave
#68 3223048-68.patch5.87 KBRishi Kulshreshtha
#68 3223048-68.patch5.87 KBRishi Kulshreshtha
#63 after_patch60.png63.07 KBsonam.chaturvedi
#63 before_patch60.png74.91 KBsonam.chaturvedi
#61 Before patch.png280.25 KBRinku Jacob 13
#61 After patch.png342.66 KBRinku Jacob 13
#60 interdiff-48-60.txt2.14 KBsmustgrave
#60 3223048-60.patch5.17 KBsmustgrave
#59 interdiff-48-59.txt2.15 KBsmustgrave
#59 3223048-59.patch5.18 KBsmustgrave
#56 interdiff-14-48.txt1.22 KBtim.plunkett
#48 3223048-48.patch4.61 KBsmustgrave
#45 interdiff-42-45.txt704 bytessmustgrave
#45 3223048-45.patch4.53 KBsmustgrave
#44 interdiff-42-44.txt0 bytessmustgrave
#44 3223048-44.patch4.51 KBsmustgrave
#42 interdiff-37-42.txt2.01 KBsmustgrave
#42 3223048-42.patch4.51 KBsmustgrave
#37 interdiff-3223048-33-37.txt827 bytessmustgrave
#37 3223048-37.patch4.02 KBsmustgrave
#35 3223048.35.patch7.56 KBimmaculatexavier
#33 interdiff-3223048-31-33.txt1.47 KByogeshmpawar
#33 3223048-33.patch3.75 KByogeshmpawar
#31 3223048-31.patch3.38 KBravi.shankar
#25 After Patch 3223048.png368.62 KBchetanbharambe
#25 Before Patch 3223048.png348.43 KBchetanbharambe
#24 3223048-filter-24.patch3.82 KBsmustgrave
#23 3223048-filter-23.patch4.19 KBsmustgrave
#22 3223048-filter-22.patch4.19 KBsmustgrave
#21 Screen Shot 2021-10-15 at 11.36.04 AM.png53.56 KBsmustgrave
#21 Screen Shot 2021-10-15 at 11.35.58 AM.png40.01 KBsmustgrave
#21 Screen Shot 2021-10-15 at 11.35.52 AM.png60.71 KBsmustgrave
#10 3223048-filter-10-PASS.patch3.36 KBtim.plunkett
#10 3223048-filter-10-FAIL.patch1.61 KBtim.plunkett
#5 3223048-5.patch1.75 KBranjith_kumar_k_u
#3 3223048-layout-builder-filtering-3.patch2.12 KBsmustgrave
#2 3223048-layout-builder-filtering-2.patch1.26 KBsmustgrave
Screen Shot 2021-07-09 at 1.41.53 PM.png49.79 KBsmustgrave

Issue fork drupal-3223048

Command icon Show commands

Start within a Git clone of the project using the version control instructions.

Or, if you do not have SSH keys set up on git.drupalcode.org:

Support from Acquia helps fund testing for Drupal Acquia logo

Comments

smustgrave created an issue. See original summary.

smustgrave’s picture

Tried to keep it simple. If the link is being toggled then toggle the parent li.

smustgrave’s picture

Status: Active » Needs review
FileSize
2.12 KB

Wrong patch. Forgot the change to the es6 file

ryan.gibson’s picture

Thanks for reporting and the work! Can confirm the patch resolves the issue in latest 9.2.x.

ranjith_kumar_k_u’s picture

Fixed custom commands failure

kevinting’s picture

Patch at #5 also works for me on Drupal core 9.2.4

smustgrave’s picture

Status: Needs review » Reviewed & tested by the community

Going to say this has been tested by the community

tim.plunkett’s picture

Version: 9.2.x-dev » 9.3.x-dev
Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Needs work
Issue tags: +JavaScript, +Needs tests

Agreed, but it is missing tests. It should be possible to assert that only the expected <li> tags are visible.

tim.plunkett’s picture

Assigned: Unassigned » tim.plunkett

Working on a test

tim.plunkett’s picture

Assigned: tim.plunkett » Unassigned
Issue summary: View changes
Status: Needs work » Needs review
Issue tags: -Needs tests
FileSize
1.61 KB
3.36 KB

Here's a test. Turns out there was an existing one that made the same bad assumption the JS made!

The last submitted patch, 10: 3223048-filter-10-FAIL.patch, failed testing. View results

tim.plunkett’s picture

Status: Needs review » Needs work
  1. +++ b/core/modules/layout_builder/js/layout-builder.es6.js
    @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
               $link.toggle(textMatch);
    +          $link.parent().toggle(textMatch);
    

    This shouldn't need to be a second call. Instead, replace the existing toggle call with the parent call. That will toggle them both.

  2. +++ b/core/modules/layout_builder/js/layout-builder.es6.js
    @@ -84,6 +85,7 @@
               $filterLinks.show();
    +          $('.js-layout-builder-block-link').parent().show();
    

    This selector is the same as $filterLinks. So similar to the last piece of feedback, both of these links could be replaced with $filterLinks.parent().show();

Theresa.Grannum made their first commit to this issue’s fork.

Theresa.Grannum’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
Theresa.Grannum’s picture

smustgrave’s picture

May need some tweaking. The filtering seems to work but if you delete some letters from your search it doesn't run.

tim.plunkett’s picture

Status: Needs review » Needs work

@smustgrave Thanks! It would help to know: is that true with the latest MR and with the patch from #10? I know that part works fine without the patch...
That will help understand if my suggestions after #10 were what broke things, and then the tests can be expanded appropriately.

smustgrave’s picture

I tested https://git.drupalcode.org/project/drupal/-/merge_requests/1310.diff only did you want to test a patch also?

tim.plunkett’s picture

If you could test https://www.drupal.org/files/issues/2021-10-07/3223048-filter-10-PASS.patch from #10 as well that'd be great

smustgrave’s picture

Sorry for the delay but patch 10 seems to be closer.

So I did a refresh 9.3.x-dev install

Searched for "au" and got

image 1

Search for "aut" and got

image 2

Search for "au" again and got

image 3

smustgrave’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
FileSize
4.19 KB
smustgrave’s picture

This should fix the command failure.

smustgrave’s picture

FileSize
3.82 KB

Sorry for the spam!

chetanbharambe’s picture

Status: Needs review » Reviewed & tested by the community
FileSize
348.43 KB
368.62 KB

Verified and tested patch #24.
Patch applied successfully and looks good to me.

Testing Steps:
# Goto: Appearance -> Apply Seven theme
# Goto: Extend -> Install Layout Builder Module
# Goto: /admin/structure/types/manage/page/form-display
# Enable the layout setting:
- Use Layout Builder
- Allow each content item to have its layout customized.
# Save it
# Create Basic page content type
# Save it and Goto: Layout option
# Click on Add Block
# Search any keyword like "Au"

Expected Results:
# After applying patch #24, User should not see blank space while searching any keyword

Actual Results:
# Currently, the User is able to see blank space while searching any keyword

Please refer attached screenshots for the same.
Looks good to me.
Can be a move to RTBC.

tim.plunkett’s picture

Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Needs work
Issue tags: +Needs work

This is missing test coverage for all changes since the MR in #14

smustgrave’s picture

@tim.plunkett confused what test coverage is needed that wasn't included?

Version: 9.3.x-dev » 9.4.x-dev

Drupal 9.3.0-rc1 was released on November 26, 2021, which means new developments and disruptive changes should now be targeted for the 9.4.x-dev branch. For more information see the Drupal core minor version schedule and the Allowed changes during the Drupal core release cycle.

vikashsoni’s picture

Applied #24 patch applied successfully and showing proper result without any space
Thanks for the patch

smustgrave’s picture

Status: Needs work » Reviewed & tested by the community

Moving back to reviewed as I don’t know what tests are needed

ravi.shankar’s picture

Added reroll of patch #24 on Drupal 9.4.x

tim.plunkett’s picture

Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Needs work
Issue tags: -Needs work +Needs tests

The MR in #14 passed tests, but was broken. That means the test coverage is insufficient.
The new test coverage should fail with the patch from #14, but pass with the patch from #24/#31.

yogeshmpawar’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
FileSize
3.75 KB
1.47 KB

Resolved CS issues.

yogeshmpawar’s picture

Status: Needs review » Needs work

Moving to NW for tests.

immaculatexavier’s picture

Fixed the below exception :

Drupal\Tests\layout_builder\FunctionalJavascript\BlockFilterTest
fail: [Other] Line 0 of sites/default/files/simpletest/phpunit-92.xml:
PHPUnit Test failed to complete; Error: PHPUnit 9.5.19 �[44m#StandWith�[0m�[43mUkraine�[0m

Warning: Your XML configuration validates against a deprecated schema.
Suggestion: Migrate your XML configuration using "--migrate-configuration"!

Attaching the updated patch

Status: Needs review » Needs work

The last submitted patch, 35: 3223048.35.patch, failed testing. View results

smustgrave’s picture

Added an additional test to make sure items reappear.

I did the interdiff off #33 vs #35 because 35 had phpunit config changes that I don't think should be included.

smustgrave’s picture

smustgrave’s picture

Not sure why the 1 layout builder test is failing as that didn't change.

The other2 failures are from another module in core, quickedit.

smustgrave’s picture

Found another issue. When using the X button to clear it doesn't reset the list.

Version: 9.4.x-dev » 9.5.x-dev

Drupal 9.4.0-alpha1 was released on May 6, 2022, which means new developments and disruptive changes should now be targeted for the 9.5.x-dev branch. For more information see the Drupal core minor version schedule and the Allowed changes during the Drupal core release cycle.

smustgrave’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
FileSize
4.51 KB
2.01 KB

Status: Needs review » Needs work

The last submitted patch, 42: 3223048-42.patch, failed testing. View results

smustgrave’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
FileSize
4.51 KB
0 bytes
smustgrave’s picture

FileSize
4.53 KB
704 bytes

probably would help if I included the changes disregard #44 it's the same as #42

Status: Needs review » Needs work

The last submitted patch, 45: 3223048-45.patch, failed testing. View results

smustgrave’s picture

Not sure why that test is failing if someone more verse in uniting testing wants to take a look. All the blocks should be back when just "a" is filtered.

And since $this->assertAnnounceContains('All available blocks are listed.'); this passes I'm stumped.

Currently having difficulty getting Functionaljavascript test to run locally in my lando instance.

smustgrave’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
FileSize
4.61 KB
ianchan’s picture

I am using this CSS and the blank lines with bullets no longer appear.

.links .js-layout-builder-block-link {
  color: inherit;
  margin: auto 1rem;
}

.links .js-layout-builder-block-link:hover {
  text-decoration: underline;
}

.js-layout-builder-categories ul.links {
  margin: 0;
  padding: 0;
  list-style: none;
}

.js-layout-builder-categories .claro-details__wrapper.details-wrapper {
  margin: 0 0.5rem 0.5rem 1.4rem;
}

.js-layout-builder-categories ul.links li {
  padding: 0;
  margin: 0;
}

.js-layout-builder-categories .links .js-layout-builder-block-link {
  display: block;
  margin-bottom: 0.25rem;
}
brittanydilts’s picture

Tested latest patch; passed tests

smustgrave’s picture

brittanydilts’s picture

Status: Needs review » Reviewed & tested by the community
Issue tags: -Needs tests
tim.plunkett’s picture

Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Needs work
Issue tags: +Needs tests

As I said in #32, no tests have been added since #14. Also why was the MR abandoned for patches? It makes it extremely hard to follow the changes being made.

smustgrave’s picture

what additional tests are needed that isn't already included?

smustgrave’s picture

@tim.plunkett I believe the current test cases cover the changes. The block selector was updated to '.js-layout-builder-categories li'

Even added a test to make sure all the links reappear. When the field clears to cover the change for
$(once('block-filter-text', 'input.js-layout-builder-filter', context)).on('input', debounce(filterBlockList, 200));

Tried to do an interdiff with the PR from 14 but it won't generate.

Please advise what additional tests are needed.

tim.plunkett’s picture

FileSize
1.22 KB

Here's the interdiff. I believe I was specifically referring to your comment in #17, which isn't reflected in the test coverage as far as I can see.

smustgrave’s picture

I see. Think adding a test case for searching by 3 letters then 2 will cover that. I’ll update

tim.plunkett’s picture

It's also not clear why we're toggling two elements each time now.

smustgrave’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
FileSize
5.18 KB
2.15 KB

Added some test cases for reducing the search to verify blocks return.

Also removed one of the toggles and everything still seems to work.

smustgrave’s picture

FileSize
5.17 KB
2.14 KB
Rinku Jacob 13’s picture

FileSize
342.66 KB
280.25 KB

I have successfully applied the last patch for 9.5.x. Adding Screenshots for the reference.

smustgrave’s picture

So can this be marked as RTBC?

sonam.chaturvedi’s picture

FileSize
74.91 KB
63.07 KB

Verified and tested the patch #60. Patch applied successfully.

Test Steps:
1. Enable 'Seven Theme' and install 'Layout Builder Module'
2. Goto /admin/structure/types/manage/page/form-display
3. Enable the layout setting:
- Use Layout Builder
- Allow each content item to have its layout customized.
4. Create 'Basic page' content type
5. Goto 'Layout' option
6. Click on 'Add Block'
7. Search any keyword like "Au", "cod", "user"

Test Result: No blank space is rendered on searching keywords
Attached screenshot for reference. RTBC +1

tim.plunkett’s picture

  1. +++ b/core/modules/layout_builder/js/layout-builder.es6.js
    @@ -45,7 +45,10 @@
    +          if ($(link).closest('.js-layout-builder-category').is(':hidden')) {
    +            $(link).closest('.js-layout-builder-category').show();
    +          }
    

    We have $(link) multiple times here. Probably worth a local variable? Also this deserves a comment explaining why we're show()ing something right before toggling

  2. +++ b/core/modules/layout_builder/js/layout-builder.es6.js
    @@ -84,13 +87,14 @@
               $filterLinks.show();
    +          $filterLinks.parent().show();
    

    The first double toggle was removed, but now we have this one too. This was added back since #14, and I don't know when because someone abandoned the MR for patches again...

smustgrave’s picture

Updated the MR. But prefer patches because they're easier to maintain. That MR was super behind and took some effort to get up to date.

smustgrave’s picture

Issue tags: -Needs tests

Rishi Kulshreshtha made their first commit to this issue’s fork.

Rishi Kulshreshtha’s picture

Status: Needs review » Reviewed & tested by the community
Issue tags: +Layout Builder
FileSize
5.87 KB
5.87 KB

@smustgrave, the MR looks good & in the recent version I can also see that all the points mentioned by @tim.plunkett at #64 is covered. I've fixed the trivial reports by CodeSniffer to the MR.

NB: The MR is still pointed to 9.3.x; shouldn't the target branch be 9.5.x?

I'm also attaching the backported patch for 9.4.x.

smustgrave’s picture

I'm abandoning the PR. I can't edit the PR to point to another branch or close it so don't see the value and most people are skipping over it.

#68 looks to have issues so skipping over that and just pulling the code from the PR into a patch file.

Shifali Baghel’s picture

I had have the same issue on Drupal 9.4.x
I modified few things and applied this patch and it worked.

alexpott’s picture

Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Needs work

We need a version of the patch in #69 that applies to 10.1.x & 10.0.x. Thanks and sorry as they might not have necessary back in July :(

smustgrave’s picture

Here's a 10.1 patch

smustgrave’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
Ratan Priya’s picture

Rerolled patch #72 for drupal 10.0.x.

smustgrave’s picture

Version: 9.5.x-dev » 10.1.x-dev
smustgrave’s picture

Patch #74 should be ignored.

longwave’s picture

Status: Needs review » Needs work

Comparing #69 and #72 we have lost the comments:

+++ b/core/modules/layout_builder/js/layout-builder.es6.js
@@ -43,9 +43,15 @@
+          // Checks if a category is currently hidden. Toggles the category on if so.
...
+          // Toggle the li tag of the matching link.

@@ -82,15 +88,17 @@
+          // Show all categories since filter is turned off.
...
+          // Show all li tags since filter is turned off.

I think these should remain in the 10.x version of the patch.

smustgrave’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
Issue tags: +Bug Smash Initiative
FileSize
1.19 KB
4.28 KB
Asha Nair’s picture

Hi, Is this issue fixed in 10.1.x? I couldn't find the issue in 10.1.x version. It is working fine without the patch

Asha Nair’s picture

FileSize
117.54 KB
smustgrave’s picture

I believe it appears to be working since one category is displayed. Try just 2 characters.

smustgrave’s picture

Bumping as this has been super annoying for layout builder

larowlan’s picture

Only one minor observation here, leaving at needs review

+++ b/core/modules/layout_builder/js/layout-builder.js
@@ -43,9 +43,15 @@
+          const linkJquery = $(link);
...
+          if (linkJquery.closest('.js-layout-builder-category').is(':hidden')) {
...
+          linkJquery.parent().toggle(textMatch);

I think our convention is to name variables that are a jQuery instance with a leading $

so perhaps $link instead of linkJquery

We're actively trying to remove jQuery from the project, so are we sure we want to add in new instances here? Is there a way we can achieve this with Vanilla JS.

edit: - nope we'd need #3167377: Rewrite jQuery .show() and .hide() for that, so anyone following this issue, please lend a hand with some reviews over there if you can 💙

smustgrave’s picture

FileSize
1.17 KB
4.3 KB

Updated variable

Rishi Kulshreshtha’s picture

Thanks for the patch, @smustgrave. As mentioned by @longwave:

We're actively trying to remove jQuery from the project, so are we sure we want to add in new instances here? Is there a way we can achieve this with Vanilla JS.

I've tried to convert the existing jQuery changes as per Vanilla JS.

larowlan’s picture

Hiding #85 as my comment said, no we don't need to do that here as we don't have a solution for show/hide

gaurav-mathur’s picture

Assigned: Unassigned » gaurav-mathur
gaurav-mathur’s picture

Assigned: gaurav-mathur » Unassigned
needs-review-queue-bot’s picture

Status: Needs review » Needs work
FileSize
1.59 KB

The Needs Review Queue Bot tested this issue. It either no longer applies to Drupal core, or fails the Drupal core commit checks. Therefore, this issue status is now "Needs work".

Apart from a re-roll or rebase, this issue may need more work to address feedback in the issue or MR comments. To progress an issue, incorporate this feedback as part of the process of updating the issue. This helps other contributors to know what is outstanding.

Consult the Drupal Contributor Guide to find step-by-step guides for working with issues.

larowlan’s picture

+++ b/core/modules/layout_builder/js/layout-builder.js
@@ -43,9 +43,17 @@
+          $linkJquery.parent().toggle(textMatch);

nitpick/personal preference, I'd name this $link - the $ indicates its a jQuery object

I think we need a 9.5 version of this patch with the es6 and compiled version

smustgrave’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
FileSize
1.15 KB
4.26 KB

Can work on a 9.5 patch once this lands.

DeepaliJ’s picture

Applied patch #91 on Drupal 10.1.x-dev.
The patch applied cleanly.
The issue got fixed after applying the patch.
Refer to the previous before and after screenshots.

Also, tried to apply the patch on the 9.5 version but patch failed to apply with below error:

Checking patch core/modules/layout_builder/js/layout-builder.js...
error: while searching for:
         *   The link to add the block.
         */
        const toggleBlockEntry = (index, link) => {
          const textMatch =
            link.textContent.toLowerCase().indexOf(query) !== -1;
          $(link).toggle(textMatch);
        };

        // Filter if the length of the query is at least 2 characters.

error: patch failed: core/modules/layout_builder/js/layout-builder.js:43
error: core/modules/layout_builder/js/layout-builder.js: patch does not apply
Checking patch core/modules/layout_builder/tests/src/FunctionalJavascript/BlockFilterTest.php
sonam.chaturvedi’s picture

FileSize
2.71 MB
4.54 MB

Verified and tested patch #91 on 10.1.x-dev. Patch applied cleanly.

Test Results:
1. Blank Space issue is no longer reproducible on 10.1.x-dev.
2. When changing a matching string to a shorter matching string then filter work and results match. For ex. When searched for "ch", then searched "cha" and then again searched "ch", all matching results are displayed.

Refer attached video for before and after patch.

@smustgrave This patch resolves the https://www.drupal.org/project/drupal/issues/3103506 issue.

smustgrave credited oknate.

smustgrave credited tedbow.

smustgrave’s picture

dmytro-aragorn’s picture

Here is a re-roll for the 9.5.3 version

needs-review-queue-bot’s picture

Status: Needs review » Needs work
FileSize
85 bytes

The Needs Review Queue Bot tested this issue. It no longer applies to Drupal core. Therefore, this issue status is now "Needs work".

Apart from a re-roll or rebase, this issue may need more work to address feedback in the issue or MR comments. To progress an issue, incorporate this feedback as part of the process of updating the issue. This helps other contributors to know what is outstanding.

Consult the Drupal Contributor Guide to find step-by-step guides for working with issues.

smustgrave’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
Vigneshn’s picture

smustgrave’s picture

@Vigneshn thank you for the interest but you hid the working patch for 10.1

Also expected you test a patch before uploading.

larowlan’s picture

+++ b/core/modules/layout_builder/js/layout-builder.js
@@ -43,9 +43,15 @@
+          // Checks if a category is currently hidden. Toggles the category on if so.

extreme nit pick ™️ - greater than 80 chars here

other than that I think this is ready

smustgrave’s picture

addressed 103

larowlan’s picture

Issue summary: View changes
Status: Needs review » Reviewed & tested by the community
Issue tags: -Layout Builder

Added screenshots to issue summary

  • lauriii committed a5291f0b on 10.1.x
    Issue #3223048 by smustgrave, Rishi Kulshreshtha, Theresa.Grannum, tim....

  • lauriii committed 9594732e on 10.0.x
    Issue #3223048 by smustgrave, Rishi Kulshreshtha, Theresa.Grannum, tim....
lauriii’s picture

Version: 10.1.x-dev » 9.5.x-dev
Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Needs work

Committed a5291f0 and pushed to 10.1.x. Also cherry-picked to 10.0.x. Thanks!

We still need a patch for 9.5.x since this is eligible for backport.

Rishabh Vishwakarma’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
FileSize
4.26 KB

Adding patch for 9.5.x as requested in #108

smustgrave’s picture

Status: Needs review » Needs work

#110 failed the build.

Rishabh Vishwakarma’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
FileSize
4.25 KB

Solving CCF from#110

Rishabh Vishwakarma’s picture

Solving CCF from#112

R.shaikh’s picture

Assigned: Unassigned » R.shaikh
Gauravvvv’s picture

Re-rolled patch for 9.5.x, attached interdiff for same.

smustgrave’s picture

Status: Needs review » Reviewed & tested by the community

  • lauriii committed 06eac4f5 on 9.5.x
    Issue #3223048 by smustgrave, Rishi Kulshreshtha, Theresa.Grannum, tim....
lauriii’s picture

Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Fixed
Issue tags: -JavaScript +JavaScript

Committed 06eac4f and pushed to 9.5.x. Thanks!

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.