Needs work
Project:
Default Content
Version:
2.0.x-dev
Component:
Documentation
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Bug report
Assigned:
Unassigned
Issue tags:
Reporter:
Created:
20 Jan 2020 at 14:21 UTC
Updated:
2 Jan 2025 at 19:34 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #2
Romisha commentedComment #3
Romisha commentedRemoved Drush section from ReadMe. Please review.
Comment #4
guptahemant commentedhi @Romisha
Thanks for submitting the patch, but since we are removing all the examples of drush command we should remove the references of drush commands from readme file.
like
> Content export works with a set of drush commands
and
> Generate a hal+json file for each entity to be exported using the drush commands described below.
Comment #5
Romisha commentedPlease review the updated patch.
Comment #6
joachim commented> but since we are removing all the examples of drush command we should remove the references of drush commands from readme file.
I'm confused about this. Why are we removing the documentation about the Drush commands?
Comment #7
ilgnerfagundes commentedIn line 25 are saying that it can be exported using the drush command, is it not necessary to remove it too?
* Easily export your content and its dependencies to yml using drush commandsComment #8
ilgnerfagundes commentedI'm leaving a patch without the line mentioned in comment #7 for evaluation
Comment #9
volkswagenchickThere should be a hard break at 80 characters according to drupal documentation standards. Please visit https://www.drupal.org/docs/develop/documenting-your-project/readme-temp...
Comment #10
ankithashettyTo the patch submitted in #8, I just manually word-wrapped the text within around 80 cols as per drupal documentation standards. Please review.
Comment #11
nitvirus commentedHi,
Headings underlined with ===/--- to the length of the heading, followed by a blank line.
According to https://www.drupal.org/docs/develop/documenting-your-project/readme-temp...
and other places
Comment #12
ankithashettyHello @nitvirus, thank you for reviewing.
We are updating README.md file, it uses markdown syntax. Here # chararcters will do the job for us, so I don't think underlining the headings would be necessary.
I have updated the patch accordingly, please review.
Comment #13
volkswagenchickThanks fo the new patch, here are some recommendations.
The Core module names should be capitalized.
Is there an empty space before "will"?
I recommend having hanging indents
https://www.drupal.org/docs/develop/documenting-your-project/readme-temp...
Comment #14
nitvirus commentedHi volkswagenchick,
Should I create a new patch for these changes, seems like this patch is already in RTBC.
--
Comment #15
volkswagenchickMy apologies, I marked the issue in the wrong state.
Comment #16
nitvirus commentedHey,
I have updated the patch, as per comments.
--
Nitish
Comment #17
meghasharma commentedComment #18
WebbehSome minor cleanup of existing copy.
Removal of todo in README, as it seems pretty out-of-place and better scoped to a drupal.org issue.
Also standardized core capitalizations document-wide, as this was missed on the bottom part of the document.
Added some consistent spacing.
Patch and interdiff attached.
Comment #19
meghasharma commentedit looks good to me..
Comment #20
volkswagenchick@meghasharma Thanks for the review, testing patches is so important to move the projects forward.
I have a suggestion though. Can you indicate what tests you did or what you reviewed?
For example:
"Patch applied locally. I reviewed the file for grammar, spelling. Links work as expected." That helps others to know that the review is complete.
Thanks!
~AmyJune
Comment #21
bmunslow commentedI'm confused too!
Documentation about the Drush commands was the highlight of the README file for me.
Do they really have to be removed from the README file?
If so, could we include an indication on where users should go to learn which drush commands are available and how to use them?
Comment #22
WebbehMarking back to Needs Review per #21. Does the existing community documentation satisfy what you're looking for on this, @bmunslow? https://www.drupal.org/docs/8/modules/default-content-for-d8/overview
Comment #23
bmunslow commentedThanks for pointing this out Webbeh.
Existing community documentation, as of today, is complete and helpful regarding the drush commands.
Settings this back to RTBC!
Comment #24
berdirI've recently created the 2.0.x branch, see the project page on all the improvements in that branch. Testing that and providing feedback would be very welcome. The 1.x branch isn't actively maintained anymore.
2.0.x uses a completely different normalization implementation that does not depend on hal.module anymore. I did forget to update the README however. I updated the project page, so if someone wants to work on updating the README based on the project page that would be very welcome.
Comment #25
vicheldt commentedI'll read the new documenation and add the proper details to the module's README file.
Comment #27
vicheldt commentedI changed the titles to all caps, and added block to the Maintainers too. Also i reorganized the part where the Drush commands are located, but didn't remove them because of the #6 and #21 comments requirements.
Comment #28
volkswagenchickAt quick glance these lines have a trailing space or character at the end of them.
Thanks for the patch
Comment #29
vicheldt commentedI'll erase all the trailing space.
Comment #30
vicheldt commentedI erased all the extra spaces, anything else?
Comment #31
vicheldt commentedComment #32
dandeleon03 commentedHi @vicheldt,
The trailing space or character at the end of the line is now removed.
Comment #33
dandeleon03 commentedComment #34
dandeleon03 commentedComment #35
dandeleon03 commentedComment #37
rajeshreeputra+1 RTBC, rebased.
Comment #38
andypostlast patch failed to apply but there's MR created (applies cleanly) so it require review
Comment #40
andypostClosed duplicate #3332222: Update README.md file according to README.md template on 2.0.x-dev
Comment #44
andypostClosed another duplicate #3176534: Example commands in README wrong
Comment #46
andypostAnd one more #3247375: Replace all references to Drupal 8 with Drupal 9 or just Drupal
Comment #50
volkswagenchick@kavitha@specbee.com Generally, it is best practice to explain what criteria you used to move the issue into RTBC.
What did you test? Were all comments addressed? Did all the links work as expected, coding standards, clear concise sentences, and so on.
Thanks.
Comment #51
ressaI agree @volkswagenchick. See also #3315968-22: Replace README.txt with README.md where another RTBC was based on the patch applying, and no review of format or content.
Comment #52
gisleNon-review by kavitha@specbee.com deleted as spam.
Comment #53
benjifisherIt seems that the README was updated in other issues, so the MR for this issue no longer applies.
The points mentioned in the issue summary are no longer true: they have been fixed. But at least some text in the MR is probably worth saving. (I do not see anything in the current README about access control.) So I am marking this issue as NW, not Closed (outdated).
Comment #54
benjifisherOne problem I noticed in the current README:
The command is actually
drush default-content:export-references.