Needs review
Project:
Default Content
Version:
2.0.x-dev
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Bug report
Assigned:
Issue tags:
Reporter:
Created:
29 May 2019 at 13:22 UTC
Updated:
24 Feb 2026 at 14:17 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #2
skounis commentedComment #3
skounis commentedComment #4
skounis commentedComment #5
skounis commentedComment #6
skounis commentedComment #7
skounis commentedComment #8
berdirComment #9
andypostneeds reroll after #3098095: Remove deprecated code and declare 9.0 compatibility
Comment #10
andypostnew service needs post_update hook to rebuild container
nor sure it needs this BC, I found no other contrib which overrrides the service
Comment #11
rpayanmComment #12
berdirI've recently created the 2.0.x branch, see the project page on all the improvements in the 2.0.x branch. The 1.x branch isn't actively maintained and won't receive new features anymore, so moving this over to 2.0.x. Agree that this would be good to have.
Will need a reroll however.
Comment #13
ankithashettyRerolled the patch in #11 to 2.0.x.
Comment #14
johnwebdev commentedDo you really want to continue with importing potential broken content? I'm thinking instead we should use transactions, and rollback all content being imported if any exception occur.
Comment #15
andypostMoreover to broken content you can also get commits from dblog or custom modules.
Trying to use transactions is very fragile way with a tons of workarounds and compromise... I'd say just throw exception and fix content or code
Comment #16
a.hover commentedRerolled the patch in #13 to the latest version of 2.0.x.
Comment #17
c_archer commentedPatch in #16 fails against the latest dev release.
Comment #18
a.hover commentedRerolled the patch in #16 to the latest version of 2.0.x.
Comment #19
a.hover commentedRerolled the patch in #17 to the latest version of 2.0.x