when using the following filter definition
[bg|bvz-19270611|3|200]
the resulting table shows the (portrait) pictures with huge black gap between each (see http://archiv.bgv-rhein-berg.de/node/2147 )
Is this a known bug or am I doing something wrong?

Regards
Schildi

CommentFileSizeAuthor
#8 drupal-bvz2.png180.96 KBschildi
#6 drupal-bvz1.png281.15 KBschildi
Support from Acquia helps fund testing for Drupal Acquia logo

Comments

Vacilando’s picture

Vacilando CreditAttribution: Vacilando commented

1) No gallery shows on that page. Can you make it show so that I can look at it?

2) Use the latest version of BG (now at 2.10).

schildi’s picture

schildi CreditAttribution: schildi commented

Sorry, when installing version 2.8. the info file defining the dependency "lightbox2" was overwritten.

I also just installed version 5-2.10 and the effect described is still present.

Regards
Schildi

Vacilando’s picture

Vacilando CreditAttribution: Vacilando commented

It's basically because all of your images are vertical rather than horizontal. Of course, it is not your problem - just a case I haven't thought about when coding the automatic resizing logic. I'll try to fix that tonight and update this thread.

schildi’s picture

schildi CreditAttribution: schildi commented

thanks in advance
Schildi

Vacilando’s picture

Vacilando CreditAttribution: Vacilando commented
Status: Active » Fixed

schildi - get v2.12 - I've just fixed the issue you ran into. Enjoy!

schildi’s picture

schildi CreditAttribution: schildi commented
FileSize
drupal-bvz1.png281.15 KB

Thank you for responding so quickly!

I just installed version 2.12.
But, sorry, nothings seems to have changed.

Please, again have a look at node 2147.

Regards
Schildi

Vacilando’s picture

Vacilando CreditAttribution: Vacilando commented

Hmm.. so I have downloaded your 9 images (though in lower than original quality) and displayed them using tag [bg|verticals|3|200] on a test page - and it seems to work, see http://quidne.vacilando.org/test

Perhaps you have too wide maximum width set in BG preferences? Try the above tag to override the width. Let me know.

schildi’s picture

schildi CreditAttribution: schildi commented
FileSize
drupal-bvz2.png180.96 KB

May be I misunderstood the meaning of "Maximum width of full image". Its value is set to 10000 as you can see in the screen shot.
So I first try to lower this value and set it to 750 ...

no effect
By the way. Node 2208 also uses BG and shows a couple of stitched images (landscape) without a harm (ok, also with thick black border).
I don't know what I am doing wrong. What do you mean with "Try the above tag ( [bg|verticals|3|200] ) to override the width".
The tag I am using looks quite similar, only the directory name differs: [bg|bvz-19270611|3|200]

Regards
Schildi

Anonymous’s picture

(not verified) CreditAttribution: commented
Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)
garym’s picture

garym CreditAttribution: garym commented
Status: Closed (fixed) » Active

This bug is actually still occurring. I have 6 portrait images that are 465x700px (which is a 4x6 ratio). I set the maximum width to 220 px in Brilliant Gallery and it instead sizes the images as if they were landscape images. So instead of having the width to 220px and height to 330px, it sets width to 220px and height to 147px (which is a 6x4 ratio). This ends up showing big gaps between images. Example here: http://kristinit.com/testgallery

Can you help? Thanks! I am attempting a jquery cludge fix in my "live" gallery page so I left the example http://kristinit.com/testgallery untouched for you to see.