Problem/Motivation
We could be using README.md instead of README.txt to make use of the nicer rendering via markdown.
Steps to reproduce
We could be using README.md instead of README.txt following the README.md template.
Also, follow the pattern in the README.md template.
https://www.drupal.org/docs/develop/managing-a-drupalorg-theme-module-or...
Issue fork colorpalette-3365045
Show commands
Start within a Git clone of the project using the version control instructions.
Or, if you do not have SSH keys set up on git.drupalcode.org:
- 3365045-UPDATE-README-FILE
changes, plain diff MR !5
- 1.0.x
compare
- 3365045-Replace-README
changes, plain diff MR !3
Comments
Comment #4
akshay kashyap commentedComment #5
akshay kashyap commentedComment #6
akshay kashyap commentedComment #7
rushikesh raval commentedI have reviewed your changes in README.md You have just copied Readme.txt file to README.md but need to rearrange sections as per
https://www.drupal.org/docs/develop/managing-a-drupalorg-theme-module-or...
Comment #9
anjali mehta commentedKindly review the changes.
Thank you.
Comment #10
abhaysaraf commentedThank you Anjali for updating the content of this file with the correct format as per https://www.drupal.org/docs/develop/managing-a-drupalorg-theme-module-or....
I would like to merge it but there is no PR, can you raise one? If possible, please accommodate suggestions added within the commit (at https://git.drupalcode.org/issue/colorpalette-3365045/-/commit/bd4e4493d...). Thank you.
Comment #11
rushikesh raval commentedStill needs needs some work. it is not as per recommendation by Drupal.
Requirement & configuration section missing.
Please Refer : https://www.drupal.org/docs/develop/managing-a-drupalorg-theme-module-or...
Comment #12
anjali mehta commentedThank you for the review. I will work on the suggestions.
Comment #14
anjali mehta commentedHello @abhaysaraf
Created MR5 to update the README.md file as per the Drupal READMe.md template. Added all the suggestions addressed in #10.
Kindly review the changes .
Thank you.
Comment #15
rushikesh raval commented@Anjali Mehta Thanks for your contribution and MR. Now it format is as per Drupal Requirement. But Maintainers section is missing in this MR. So I suggest to add this section with name of maintainers.
Comment #16
anjali mehta commentedHello @rushiraval,
Thank you for the review. Please follow comment #10, as it was suggested by the maintainer of this module that:
Additionally, please note that this section is optional, as stated in the Drupal README.md template. Therefore, it's not mandatory to include this section in the readme.md file.
Considering this, I'm changing the status back to NR.
Thank you.
Comment #17
rushikesh raval commented@Anjali Mehta Thanks for your contribution. I have review MR!1 and MR!1 is as per drupal recommendation.
I am changing status to RTBC.
Comment #18
abhaysaraf commentedComment #20
abhaysaraf commentedMR-5 merged. Thank you everyone for supporting the module.