[D7] SugarPort - SugarCRM Customer Portal for Drupal

There are some errors reported by automated review tools, did you already check them? See http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpsgitdrupalorgprojectsugarcrm_customer_po...

Fixed the git clone URL in the issue summary for non-maintainer users.

We are currently quite busy with all the project applications and we prefer projects with a review bonus. Please help reviewing and put yourself on the high priority list, then we will take a look at your project right away :-)

Also, you should get your friends, colleagues or other community members involved to review this application. Let them go through the review checklist and post a comment that sets this issue to "needs work" (they found some problems with the project) or "reviewed & tested by the community" (they found no major flaws).

I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.

Hi biztechcs,

Kindly see the automated review of your project.

Link: https://pareview.sh/node/1980

Hi biztechcs,

We must adhere the drupal coding standards to ensure the quality of module and get it approved. In addition to that found security issues

DrupalSecure has found some issues with your code (please check the Writing secure core handbook).

Example: Input variables needs to be sanitized.

There are still lot of warnings and errors in the pareview. Please fix all the ones mentioned in pareview and then change the status to needs review.

The link to the project is https://www.drupal.org/project/sugarcrm_customer_portal.

Automated Review

Pareview throws an error because of too many errors in your code. Please use http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpsgitdrupalorgprojectsugarcrm_customer_po... correct all issues.

Manual Review

Individual user account

No: Does not follow the guidelines for individual user accounts.

No duplication

No: Causes module duplication and/or fragmentation. What is the difference to other SugarCRM modules?

Master Branch

No: Does not follow the guidelines for master branch. Change Branch name to 7.x-1.x.

Licensing

Yes: Follows the licensing requirements.

3rd party assets/code

No: Does not follow the guidelines for 3rd party assets/code. jQuery, jQueryUI and Bootstrap, FontAwesome code in js, css and font, use library in libraries folder

README.txt/README.md

No: Does not follow the guidelines for in-project documentation and/or the README Template.

Code long/complex enough for review

Yes: Follows the guidelines for project length and complexity.

Secure code

No: List of security issues identified: filter $_REQUEST variable to prevent cross site scripting attacks: https://www.drupal.org/docs/7/security/writing-secure-code/overview

Coding style & Drupal API usage

1. (*) delete README.txt~
2. (*) Use an indent of 2 spaces, with no tabs: https://www.drupal.org/docs/develop/standards/coding-standards#indenting
3. (*) Three versions of the pdf manual, better provide a handbook page: https://www.drupal.org/docs/develop/documenting-your-project/module-docu...
4. (*) rename drupal_sugar_portal.info , drupal_sugar_portal.install and drupal_sugar_portal.module to match your project name.

The starred items (*) are fairly big issues and warrant going back to Needs Work. Items marked with a plus sign (+) are important and should be addressed before a stable project release. The rest of the comments in the code walkthrough are recommendations.

If added, please don't remove the security tag, we keep that for statistics and to show examples of security problems.

This review uses the Project Application Review Template.

If you are still working on this application, you should fix all known problems and set the status to Needs review. (See also the project application workflow.)
Please don't change status of this application if you aren't sure you have time to dedicate to this application, or it will be closed again as won't fix.

I am closing this application due to lack of activity.