Situation:
When sending email with Rules HTML email, the current dev SMTP module version always adds Reply-to Address used for SMTP authentication to the email.
Problem:
Multiple reply-to addresses confuse mail clients, cause the recipient to reply to multiple addresses, some of which are not desired.
Expected Behaviour:
There is some discussion going in other issues, so I will try to tackle it from broader perspective:
Scenario A
My SMTP does not allow to send mail with "From" field in other domain than SMTP itself (eg. cannot send mail from test@gmail.com from my SMTP running @visionapps.cz; I can only send from like test@visionapps.cz). I believe this to be usual scenario.
The module should handle Reply-to following way:
a) Reply-To Address in not specified and From address is different from SMTP – write From address to Reply-To, change From to SMTP. Otherwise the email will not be sent.
b) Reply-To Address in not specified and From address is the same as SMTP - do nothing
c) Reply-To Address in specified – use the specified address
Scenario B
My SMTP does allow to send mail with "From" field in other domain than SMTP itself (eg. can send mail from test@gmail.com from my SMTP running @visionapps.cz)
The module should handle Reply-to following way:
a) Reply-To Address in not specified and From address is any address – set nothing to Reply-to
b) Reply-To Address in specified – use the specified address
Hope this makes sense and will help clean the behaviour a little. I am happy to test.
Comments
Comment #2
wundo CreditAttribution: wundo at Chuva Inc. for Galoa Science commentedComment #3
Collins405 CreditAttribution: Collins405 commentedJust ran into this too.
We're using amazon SES, setup with SMTP module sending from "noreply@mysite.com"
I am explicitly setting the Reply-to header to a single email address
However, looking at the headers in the email source, they are...
Reply-to: brands@mysite.com, noreply@mysite.com
This means any user replying is given our automatic "no reply" response. How do I remove the default secondary email?
Comment #4
Collins405 CreditAttribution: Collins405 commentedComment #5
Collins405 CreditAttribution: Collins405 commentedActually, I found the issue.
This is due to the headers being able to be set in any case.
e.g. Reply-to and Reply-To
Changing my code to use the latter meant that it properly overrode the original, rather than appending an item to an array.
Comment #6
TR CreditAttribution: TR commentedPlease don't just close issues because you fixed it on YOUR site - if it's a bug, it's a bug and needs to be fixed for everyone.
This is a real bug, and the reasons for it are described in #3174406: Problem with Reply-To field. It is NOT sufficient to just say change the case of "Reply-to" because headers are DEFINED to be CASE INSENSITIVE by the RFC. So all you've done is to avoid the issue for your own personal use-case. This remains a bug with the SMTP module.
Rather than re-open a old, closed issue, please contribute to the open issue at #3174406: Problem with Reply-To field and help fix this bug.
Marking this as a duplicate so other's can find the current issue.