Recently I ran a drush audit and it complained that none of my views have caching enabled. I was beginning to manually edit my views when I thought there should be a module to handle this globally and I found views_cache_bully. Thank you!

However, I read on your homepage...

...make exemptions for specific views, notably those with exposed filters (which don't always play well with caching).

Most of my views of concern have exposed filters. So then am I better off with no views caching?

Comments

webservant316 created an issue. See original summary.

dstol’s picture

Assigned: Unassigned » dstol
Priority: Normal » Minor
Status: Active » Fixed

At the time, the views module didn't really support caching all that well on views with exposed filters. I'm pretty sure that this has been fixed in more recent versions of 7.x views.

You could just enable caching on a view with exposed filters and test out to see if the view displays as you would expect. If it does work as expected great, if it doesn't, adjust cache settings (including disabling) until it does.

webservant316’s picture

okay thanks.

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.