Problem/Motivation

On the Extend page, modules are grouped by functionality, but Mollom is listed under Acquia. For users, this is not a useful information because users who decide which modules to enable on their site need to know what a module does, not which company developed it. Usability would be improved by placing Mollom under a different header.

Proposed resolution

Place Mollom under a header that describes its functionality. A good option would be "Spam control", where similar modules such as CAPTCHA are placed as well.

Remaining tasks

Replace the Package value in mollom.info.yml

User interface changes

This is a UI text change.

API changes

Data model changes

Support from Acquia helps fund testing for Drupal Acquia logo

Comments

ifrik created an issue. See original summary.

Gábor Hojtsy’s picture

Issue tags: +DevDaysMilan

The 7.x versions don't have Acquia as a package name either. I agree it is not very descriptive. What is the goal with the naming?

id.tarzanych’s picture

Assigned: Unassigned » id.tarzanych
id.tarzanych’s picture

id.tarzanych’s picture

Status: Active » Needs review

Status: Needs review » Needs work

The last submitted patch, 4: 2752815-mollom-package-change-4.patch, failed testing.

The last submitted patch, 4: 2752815-mollom-package-change-4.patch, failed testing.

The last submitted patch, 4: 2752815-mollom-package-change-4.patch, failed testing.

eshta’s picture

Apologies for the lack of response. There have been a lot of competing priorities lately. The intent with placing this under the "Acquia" label was to group it with other Acquia provided services. Since the Mollom acquisition there has been confusion. Additionally, I'm working on the test suite now to see why these failures are occurring. It appear to be due to change in Drupal core.