Problem/Motivation
On the Extend page, modules are grouped by functionality, but Mollom is listed under Acquia. For users, this is not a useful information because users who decide which modules to enable on their site need to know what a module does, not which company developed it. Usability would be improved by placing Mollom under a different header.
Proposed resolution
Place Mollom under a header that describes its functionality. A good option would be "Spam control", where similar modules such as CAPTCHA are placed as well.
Remaining tasks
Replace the Package value in mollom.info.yml
User interface changes
This is a UI text change.
API changes
Data model changes
Comment | File | Size | Author |
---|---|---|---|
#4 | 2752815-mollom-package-change-4.patch | 367 bytes | id.tarzanych |
Comments
Comment #2
Gábor HojtsyThe 7.x versions don't have Acquia as a package name either. I agree it is not very descriptive. What is the goal with the naming?
Comment #3
id.tarzanych CreditAttribution: id.tarzanych commentedComment #4
id.tarzanych CreditAttribution: id.tarzanych at Internetdevels commentedPlease review my patch
Comment #5
id.tarzanych CreditAttribution: id.tarzanych at Internetdevels commentedComment #9
eshta CreditAttribution: eshta at Acquia commentedApologies for the lack of response. There have been a lot of competing priorities lately. The intent with placing this under the "Acquia" label was to group it with other Acquia provided services. Since the Mollom acquisition there has been confusion. Additionally, I'm working on the test suite now to see why these failures are occurring. It appear to be due to change in Drupal core.