Target mapping processors for Feeds module to be able to import nodes by assigning their parent in Nodehierarchy.

Project page: https://www.drupal.org/sandbox/adamjakab/2735161

Git clone command:

git clone --branch 7.x-1.x https://git.drupal.org/sandbox/adamjakab/2735161.git feeds_nodehierarchy_processor
cd feeds_nodehierarchy_processor

Comments

jakabadambalazs created an issue. See original summary.

PA robot’s picture

Issue summary: View changes
Status: Needs review » Needs work

There are some errors reported by automated review tools, did you already check them? See http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpsgitdrupalorgsandboxadamjakab2735161git

Fixed the git clone URL in the issue summary for non-maintainer users.

We are currently quite busy with all the project applications and we prefer projects with a review bonus. Please help reviewing and put yourself on the high priority list, then we will take a look at your project right away :-)

Also, you should get your friends, colleagues or other community members involved to review this application. Let them go through the review checklist and post a comment that sets this issue to "needs work" (they found some problems with the project) or "reviewed & tested by the community" (they found no major flaws).

I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.

neeravbm’s picture

Hi jakabadambalazs,

Automated Review

See http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpsgitdrupalorgsandboxadamjakab2735161git

Review of the 7.x-1.x branch (commit a712e3e):

README.md or README.txt is missing, see the guidelines for in-project documentation.
No automated test cases were found, did you consider writing Simpletests or PHPUnit tests? This is not a requirement but encouraged for professional software development.

Manual Review

Individual user account
Yes: Follows the guidelines for individual user accounts.
No duplication
Yes: Does not cause module duplication and/or fragmentation.
Master Branch
Yes: Follows the guidelines for master branch.
Licensing
Yes: Follows the licensing requirements.
3rd party assets/code
Yes: Follows the guidelines for 3rd party assets/code.
README.txt/README.md
No: Does not follow the guidelines for in-project documentation and/or the README Template.
Code long/complex enough for review
Yes: Follows the guidelines for project length and complexity.
Secure code
Yes: Meets the security requirements.
Coding style & Drupal API usage
  1. (+) Add a README file following README Template
  2. You can add hook_help in your module file

The starred items (*) are fairly big issues and warrant going back to Needs Work. Items marked with a plus sign (+) are important and should be addressed before a stable project release. The rest of the comments in the code walkthrough are recommendations.

If added, please don't remove the security tag, we keep that for statistics and to show examples of security problems.

This review uses the Project Application Review Template.

PA robot’s picture

Status: Needs work » Closed (won't fix)

Closing due to lack of activity. If you are still working on this application, you should fix all known problems and then set the status to "Needs review". (See also the project application workflow).

I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.