Support for Drupal 7 is ending on 5 January 2025—it’s time to migrate to Drupal 10! Learn about the many benefits of Drupal 10 and find migration tools in our resource center.
Don't let error throw blocks other scripts execution.
Comment | File | Size | Author |
---|---|---|---|
#16 | Screenshot 2020-09-29 at 3.52.42 PM.png | 53.48 KB | nishantghetiya |
Comments
Comment #5
droplet CreditAttribution: droplet commentedNeeds patch reroll
Comment #11
sharma.amitt16 CreditAttribution: sharma.amitt16 as a volunteer and at Srijan | A Material+ Company for Drupal India Association commentedRerolled the patch for 9.1.x.
Comment #12
tanubansal CreditAttribution: tanubansal at Salsa Digital commentedTested #11, changes are visible
This can be moved to RTBC
Comment #13
nod_When modifying js files, it's the .es6.js files that needs to be updated, see https://www.drupal.org/docs/frontend-developer-tools-for-drupal-core
Also the reroll changes code that is generated by babel, which is not expected
Comment #14
raman.b CreditAttribution: raman.b at OpenSense Labs commentedMade required changes, resolved formatting issues and compiled
ajax.es6.js
toajax.js
Comment #15
nishantghetiya CreditAttribution: nishantghetiya at QED42 for Drupal India Association commentedComment #16
nishantghetiya CreditAttribution: nishantghetiya at QED42 for Drupal India Association commentedPatch applied successfully and also satisfy #13 changes.
Comment #17
quietone CreditAttribution: quietone as a volunteer commentedI have read through the issue and see that this is tagged as needing manual testing but not testing has been done. I also find the IS too vague. Does this problem exists in other files or just the ones changed in the patch?
Setting to NW for, at least, the manual testing.
Comment #21
Kristen PolThe issue summary isn't clear and there are no steps to reproduce the issue so tagging.
I'm unclear if this is a bug or just a task. If I understand correctly, the issue summary says this blocks execution for other scripts. If this is the case, IMO this is a bug.
Nitpick: When reviewing the code, I see there is an inconsistency between formatting where some are "nicely" formatted and others are inline. It would be nice to be consistent. Examples: