Then you rearrange the order of processors and hit save it returns to previous state.
New order is not saved.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #6 | facet_s_processors-2656220-6.patch | 1.82 KB | borisson_ |
| #5 | facet_s_processors-2656220-5.patch | 3.99 KB | borisson_ |
Then you rearrange the order of processors and hit save it returns to previous state.
New order is not saved.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #6 | facet_s_processors-2656220-6.patch | 1.82 KB | borisson_ |
| #5 | facet_s_processors-2656220-5.patch | 3.99 KB | borisson_ |
Comments
Comment #2
evaldas.uzkurasPatch for quick solution.
Comment #3
borisson_Setting to NR for the testbot.
I'm not sure if we can write an integration test for this but I can give it a try.
Comment #4
evaldas.uzkurasAdding new patch.
Processor weight form fields' values was not set correctly - default values instead of new ones.
For making test, you could try to check value of hidden weight field.
Comment #5
borisson_Added a test. (test-only is interdiff)
Comment #6
borisson_Re-uploading --test-only to trigger testbot.
Comment #9
borisson_Committed and pushed, thanks for the issue and patch.
Comment #11
borisson_