Support for Drupal 7 is ending on 5 January 2025—it’s time to migrate to Drupal 10! Learn about the many benefits of Drupal 10 and find migration tools in our resource center.
I have a vocabulary called Occupations where i have some terms like Programmer, Dentist on the term page the breadcrumb looks like: Home >> Occupations >> >> Dentist.
The Home/Occupations links are okay the 3rd also contains the good link but no text and the 4th value is linked to /taxonomy/term/all it should be only Home >> Occupations >> Dentist .
The taxonomy page is overwritten by the views taxonomy/term/% page but tried without it also and the I got the same results.
Comments
Comment #1
kiss.jozsef CreditAttribution: kiss.jozsef commentedComment #2
RyanPrice CreditAttribution: RyanPrice as a volunteer commentedWhat does your menu structure look like? I was unable to recreate this.
Comment #3
kiss.jozsef CreditAttribution: kiss.jozsef commentedI don't have the taxonomies in the menu (it seems this was the main issue) at first i didn't set something how i should've.
Using Views taxonomy/term/% page the breadcrumbs look like Home >> Occupations >> Taxonomy term , it won't find the title of the term , if in the view the title is changed to %1(then the page title) is set but it will look like
Home >> Occupations >> Taxonomy term >> Dentist for example.
Comment #4
RyanPrice CreditAttribution: RyanPrice as a volunteer commentedI'm still a little confused on your structure.
It sounds like you have a taxonomy of "Occupations" of which "Dentist" and "Programmer" belong to.
Would "Home >> Occupations >> Dentist" not be correct? What are you seeing instead?
Comment #5
kiss.jozsef CreditAttribution: kiss.jozsef commented"Home >> Occupations >> Dentist" would be correct but it shows
"Home >> Occupations >> Taxonomy term >>Dentist" => the Taxonomy term actually goes to the correct page just the label is off and then Dentist goes to "taxonomy/term/all"
By installing https://www.drupal.org/project/taxonomy_menu the "Taxonomy term" part gets fixed but can't get rid off the last part only from css which is not the best solution.
Comment #6
xurizaemonClosing a lot of ancient (> 4 years) issues. It's fine to re-open if you think there's something of value to be discussed.