Please make your build-panopoly.make file follow the standard:

build-[distro].make files should contain the project itself to download, so basically add:

projects[panopoly][type] = profile 
projects[panopoly][download][type] = git
projects[panopoly][download][branch] = 7.x-1.x

Just like it's done in spark:

Otherwise this distribution won't work on

Members fund testing for the Drupal project. Drupal Association Learn more


beeradb’s picture

Status: Active » Needs review
472 bytes

Seems like a reasonable request.

patrickd’s picture

Status: Needs review » Reviewed & tested by the community

Seems to work for me,


joelcollinsdc’s picture

This goes against the building inplace methodology described here:

And, although i had never heard of it being done this way before, it is actually quite novel and good for development. Can we keep a different build file around that could be used for those of us who like the inplace variety over the other way?


patrickd’s picture

Well, that's maybe the panopoly mythology but not the usual case, just have a look at spark, commerce_kickstart or drupal commons for example..
It's not vital but why making panopoly a special case?

joelcollinsdc’s picture

Why limit it to only one if both work?

joelcollinsdc’s picture

sylus’s picture

Doesn't the different builds change where the modules are placed by default? IE

a) /profiles/panopoly/modules/custom
b) /sites/all/modules/custom/

mgifford’s picture

This has been RTBC since November. Any reason why it hasn't been committed yet?

joelcollinsdc’s picture

@ #7, yes the drush make script does have to specify the correct folder for contrib modules...


populist’s picture

Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Fixed

Apologies for not updating this issue. The change has been committed to make Panopoly work on Simplytest and I verified the -dev branch works. Look for this to break out big with RC4.

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.