When the author is not the creator of the node, it does not appear in "My Drafts" tab.

Here is my use case :
- user1 creates a new node and set user2 as author of this node (user2 cannot create node of this type)
- user2 does not see this new node in his "My Drafts" section but it appears in the content overview page

When I check node access permissions (with devel), user1 has permission to "view" and "update".

When I check permissions for user1 and "Edit moderated content" it says that user1 should have "Revert content revisions" and "MyContentType: Edit any content".

But in my case, I don't want this user to be able to create or edit any content of this type but only the ones for which he's the author.

A workaround is to use the content overview page but I would prefer to stay with the workbench way...
Any ideas of how I can manage this?

Comments

cthiebault’s picture

Issue summary: View changes

Add node access devel infos

cthiebault’s picture

Still trying...
- workbench_recent_content view does not show unpublished contents from which user is author as expected.
- workbench_edited view is based on revision editor, not content author.

hass’s picture

Version: 7.x-1.1 » 7.x-1.x-dev
Status: Active » Postponed (maintainer needs more info)

Please test under 1.3.

ldsnerd’s picture

Confirmed this is still an issue. Example to reproduce the steps:

1) add content, set the status as "published"
2) Create a new draft of that content, save it as a "draft"
3) Click on "Workbench" -> "My drafts". No titles show.

ldsnerd’s picture

Issue summary: View changes

Add "When the author is not the creator of the study, it does not appear in My Drafts tab"

dgtlmoon’s picture

Category: Bug report » Support request
Issue summary: View changes

sounds like #2447659: "View draft" opens published version / "Edit draft" opens correctly, could you try that patch and see if it helps? not sure if the change of author is having an affect or not

oranges13’s picture

Pol’s picture

@oranges13: is it for Workbench Moderation 1.x or 2.x ?

oranges13’s picture

@Pol 1.x