Part of #2571965: [meta] Fix PHP coding standards in core.

Approach

We are testing coding standards with PHP CodeSniffer, using the Drupal coding standards from the Coder module. Both of these packages are not installed in Drupal core. We need to do a couple of steps in order to download and configure them so we can run a coding standards check.

Step 1: Add the coding standard to the whitelist

Every coding standard is identified by a "sniff". For example, an imaginary coding standard that would require all llamas to be placed inside a square bracket fence would be called the "Drupal.AnimalControlStructure.BracketedFence sniff". There are dozens of such coding standards, and to make the work easier we have started by only whitelisting the sniffs that pass. For the moment all coding standards that are not yet fixed are simply skipped during the test.

Open the file core/phpcs.xml.dist and add a line for the sniff of this ticket. The sniff name is in the issue title. Make sure your patch will include the addition of this line.

Step 2: Install PHP CodeSniffer and the ruleset from the Coder module

Both of these packages are not installed by default in Drupal core, so we need to download them. This can be done with Composer, from the root folder of your Drupal installation:

$ composer require drupal/coder squizlabs/php_codesniffer
$ ./vendor/bin/phpcs --config-set installed_paths ../../drupal/coder/coder_sniffer

Once you have installed the phpcs package, you can list all the sniffs available to you like this:

$ ./vendor/bin/phpcs --standard=Drupal -e

This will give you a big list of sniffs, and the Drupal-based ones should be present.

Step 3: Prepare the phpcs.xml file

To speed up the testing you should make a copy of the file phpcs.xml.dist (in the core/ folder) and save it as phpcs.xml. This is the configuration file for PHP CodeSniffer.

We only want this phpcs.xml file to specify the sniff we're interested in. So we need to remove all the rule items, and add only our own sniff's rule. Rule items look like this:

<rule ref="Drupal.Semantics.FunctionT.ConcatString"/>

Remove all of them, and add only the sniff from this issue title. This will make sure that our tests run quickly, and are not going to contain any output from unrelated sniffs.

Step 4: Run the test

Now you are ready to run the test! From within the core/ folder, run the following command to launch the test:

$ cd core/
$ ../vendor/bin/phpcs -p

This takes a couple of minutes. The -p flag shows the progress, so you have a bunch of nice dots to look at while it is running.

Step 5: Fix the failures

When the test is complete it will present you a list of all the files that contain violations of your sniff, and the line numbers where the violations occur. You could fix all of these manually, but thankfully phpcbf can fix many of them. You can call phpcbf like this:

$ ../vendor/bin/phpcbf

This will fix the errors in place. You can then make a diff of the changes using git. You can also re-run the test with phpcs and determine if that fixed all of them.

CommentFileSizeAuthor
#2 3123068.patch5.18 KBlongwave
Support from Acquia helps fund testing for Drupal Acquia logo

Comments

jungle created an issue. See original summary.

longwave’s picture

Version: 9.0.x-dev » 9.1.x-dev
Status: Active » Needs review
FileSize
5.18 KB
daffie’s picture

Status: Needs review » Reviewed & tested by the community

Removing the rule exclusion will result in a number of errors of the type: "Do not concatenate strings to translatable strings, they should be part of the t() argument and you should use placeholders".
The other code changes in the patch fixes all the errors.
Tested this on my local machine.
All code changes look good to me.
For me it is RTBC.

alexpott’s picture

Version: 9.1.x-dev » 8.9.x-dev
Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Fixed

Committed and pushed 0955fd0458 to 9.1.x and d9510b5c63 to 9.0.x and 8c1678f27d to 8.9.x. Thanks!

Tested this on 8.9.x and it's good for there too.

This one is nice to get done because if we do add two t() objects together this will let us know. Plus the change in

+++ b/core/modules/ckeditor/src/Plugin/CKEditorPlugin/Language.php
@@ -81,12 +81,13 @@ public function getConfig(Editor $editor) {
   public function getButtons() {
+    $label = $this->t('Language');
     return [
       'Language' => [
-        'label' => $this->t('Language'),
+        'label' => $label,
         'image_alternative' => [
           '#type' => 'inline_template',
-          '#template' => '<a href="#" class="cke-icon-only" role="button" title="' . $this->t('Language') . '" aria-label="' . $this->t('Language') . '"><span class="cke_button_icon cke_button__language_icon">' . $this->t('Language') . '</span></a>',
+          '#template' => '<a href="#" class="cke-icon-only" role="button" title="' . $label . '" aria-label="' . $label . '"><span class="cke_button_icon cke_button__language_icon">' . $label . '</span></a>',
         ],
       ],

Way less objects ftw.

  • alexpott committed 0955fd0 on 9.1.x
    Issue #3123068 by longwave: Fix 'Drupal.Semantics.FunctionT.ConcatString...

  • alexpott committed d9510b5 on 9.0.x
    Issue #3123068 by longwave: Fix 'Drupal.Semantics.FunctionT.ConcatString...

  • alexpott committed 8c1678f on 8.9.x
    Issue #3123068 by longwave: Fix 'Drupal.Semantics.FunctionT.ConcatString...
xjm’s picture

Just a heads-up that while the cleanups of this issue are patch-safe (and therefore allowed during RC), enabling new PHPCS rules is not. We've actually just restored the rulesets from 9.0.0-rc1 and 8.9.0-rc1 because of this:
https://git.drupalcode.org/project/drupal/-/commit/6144e3b1f69b5ff9c786c...
https://git.drupalcode.org/project/drupal/-/commit/2a5cd8c8adcdae777324d...

The rule is still enabled in 9.1.x which makes it unlikely that a regression will be committed to 9.0 or 8.9 either.

Thanks!

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

xjm’s picture

Issue tags: +9.1.0 release notes