It seems that we cannot see multi selectable filtering dropdown list at Filters section in "/admin/build/views/views_name/"
despite we can select multiple taxonomy terms from one vocab when creating/editing a node.

Forgive me if I'm saying the wrong thing as I'm not so familier with Views module for now.

CommentFileSizeAuthor
#12 cck_taxonomy_multiselect.patch1.07 KBregx
#9 CCK_Taxonomy_2.jpg212.79 KBryo
#6 CCK_Taxonomy.jpg115.93 KBryo

Comments

ryo’s picture

ryo commented

Correction. I meant
In "/admin/build/views/views_name/edit"

robertdouglass’s picture

robertdouglass commented

I think I know what you're talking about because I found this bug today, too. Will try to improve the views code for the next release.

robertdouglass’s picture

robertdouglass commented
Status: Active » Fixed

Yup. This was a bug and I've nailed it for 1.1

ryo’s picture

ryo commented

Hmm....
I cannot confirm the fix but I might be doing something wrong.
Please give me sometime.

regards,

robertdouglass’s picture

robertdouglass commented

Make sure to clear your views cache. On fresh installation I'm able to filter on multiple select vocabs.

ryo’s picture

ryo commented
StatusFileSize
new CCK_Taxonomy.jpg115.93 KB

I deleted my view, fresh installed CCK Taxonomy 1.1, cleared my view's cash and remade my view.
But still, there appears a single term (Value) selection Operator in "/admin/build/views/project/edit".
Please see attached image and give me any suggestion when you have time.

regards,

robertdouglass’s picture

robertdouglass commented
Title: we cannot see multi selectable filtering dropdown list » Use filter handler that allows for multiple selection
Category: bug » feature
Status: Fixed » Active

Aaaah, that's what you mean! Pictures are very handy communication devices. That's by design. Perhaps there is different views filter handler that I should use, so I'm open to suggestions concerning that. But the software is doing what it is programmed to do, so I'm going to change this to a feature request for a different filter handler.

robertdouglass’s picture

robertdouglass commented
Version: 5.x-1.0 » 5.x-1.1
ryo’s picture

ryo commented
StatusFileSize
new CCK_Taxonomy_2.jpg212.79 KB

OK, I got it.
What is important is not in filtering section itself, but in "Exposing the filter".
You'll get what I want to say by seeing the attached image.
Yeah, pictures are much better communication device than my poor English! :)

toma’s picture

toma commented

The exposed filter doesn't work, you can't filter by taxonomy even if it works with some case, it doesn't filter correctly your result, its a great module and good idea, i change all my cck content to cck taxonomy and finally i discover this bug, so no filter exposed until it get corrected :p

Thanks for your great work

regx’s picture

regx commented

Basically to paraphrase, the last update fixed the list display issue in exposed views filters, where the taxonomy tree was being flattened to one level.

dogs
- poodle
- lab

was displayed as
dogs
poodle
lab

but it did not fix the multi-select issue for exposed filters.
If the taxonomy field has multi-select enables and the derived cck field has multi-select enabled, then the exposed filter should allow multiple selections. Currently the multi-select checkbox is selected automatically and greyed-out in views/exposed filters which is the correct behavior since the cck field has multi-select enabled, but the form does not allow multiple selections.

Seems like this would be a simple patch!

regx’s picture

regx commented
Category: feature » bug
Status: Active » Needs review
StatusFileSize
new cck_taxonomy_multiselect.patch1.07 KB

Ok, here is a patch that fixes multi-select in exposed filters.

regx’s picture

regx commented

The patch above is for version 5.x-1.1 , I should probably include the version in my patch names!

robertdouglass’s picture

robertdouglass commented

Thanks. Will evaluate shortly. Putting the version in your patch names isn't necessary because the issue already has a version selector. I just assume since this issue is against 1.1 that the patch will be too.

ryo’s picture

ryo commented

I'm reporting that I tried regx's patch and it works quite fine.
Thanks regx.

Please apply it and commit an updated version.

regards,

robertdouglass’s picture

robertdouglass commented
Status: Needs review » Fixed

Committed. Thanks for the patch and the review.

Anonymous’s picture

(not verified) commented
Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)