Voting starts in March for the Drupal Association Board election.
The mission of the Technical Working Group (TWG) is to make sure that the Drupal project has efficient technical policies, procedures, and standards as required to keep the "technical" side of our community operating smoothly.
The TWG's job is to ensure that the necessary policies, procedures, and standards exist to address technical concerns affecting the Drupal community. This includes items that affect all projects, such as the Drupal coding standards, Git repository usage and licensing policies, and Drupal's full-project approval process. The TWG does not necessarily author and maintain these policies itself, but merely ensures that they exist, are well maintained, and that they are successful. To do so, they appoint and empower individuals or groups within the community to care for these policies and review them as needed.
The TWG may also develop guidelines and/or recommendations regarding the introduction of new tools and technologies for the benefit of the community. Where implementation of these recommendations is dependent on Drupal Association funding, Drupal.org integration, or significant investment from the infrastructure team, the TWG will work with these groups to evaluate feasibility of any particular option or recommendation. Acceptance of TWG recommendations for key strategic issues may be subject to approval by the project lead (Dries Buytaert) or his designate(s).
For more information, read the full TWG Charter.
The current members of the TWG are:
TWG members are selected from the Drupal community by Dries Buytaert and/or his designate(s).
For discussions or proposed amendments to technical-related policies, ideas of initiatives to help improve the health of the Drupal community, or other items that could benefit from wider community discussion, you can use the Drupal Technical Working Group issue tracker. Issues in this queue will be reviewed by the TWG on a periodic basis.
Requesting technical clarification
Individuals seeking clarification on any policy, procedure, best practice, or standard maintained by the technical working group should first refer to the official TWG documentation regarding the policy or standard in question. If still unclear, and/or the documentation itself could benefit from further elaboration, individuals should bring their concern forward to the TWG. When seeking clarification from the TWG, be sure to provide enough background information for the TWG to understand the context in which the question is being asked.
Proposing changes to existing policies and/or standards
Any party who feels a policy or standard maintained by the TWG is unreasonable may propose a change to the policy in question. Generally, modification proposals should solicit discussion and support from members of the Drupal community before being brought forward to the TWG. Received proposals will be evaluated by the TWG, and may be accepted, rejected, or referred back to the proposer with a request for further elaboration or community discussion on the issue. In some cases, the TWG may refer the issue directly back to the community for further discussion before making a final decision.
Resolving technical conflict
Where disagreement should arise due to varied interpretations of a particular policy or standard maintained by the TWG, individuals may request clarification from the TWG as identified above. If the TWG's clarification is not sufficient to resolve the disagreement, individuals should step through the Conflict Resolution Process (CRP), with the assistance of the CWG if necessary. If further involvement from the TWG is required to assist in resolving the conflict (for example, the disagreement can only be resolved through an addition or modification to an existing policy), the CWG may then refer the matter back to the TWG for resolution.
Transparency and Appeals
The TWG aims to be as transparent as possible by documenting its decisions publicly. Individuals who do not agree with a given TWG decision may escalate to Dries Buytaert and/or his designate(s), who will review the decision and can choose to either uphold or alter it. In the meantime, the decision of the TWG stands.